评估冠状动脉搭桥手术风险的风险分层

Mike Rees, Jitesh Dineschandra
{"title":"评估冠状动脉搭桥手术风险的风险分层","authors":"Mike Rees, Jitesh Dineschandra","doi":"10.1109/CBMS.2006.141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present the need for risk stratification in the monitoring of cardiac surgical practice and review the frequentist and Bayesian approaches to the problem. Developments in the available databases are described. Enhancements to the Parsonnet and EuroSCORE systems are reviewed. We argue that in the UK, although the use of the Parsonnet system is inappropriate and that the EuroSCORE system is a clear improvement, there are advantages in adopting a system based on a Bayesian model for risk assessment","PeriodicalId":208693,"journal":{"name":"19th IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS'06)","volume":"321 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Stratification in Assessing Risk in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery\",\"authors\":\"Mike Rees, Jitesh Dineschandra\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CBMS.2006.141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We present the need for risk stratification in the monitoring of cardiac surgical practice and review the frequentist and Bayesian approaches to the problem. Developments in the available databases are described. Enhancements to the Parsonnet and EuroSCORE systems are reviewed. We argue that in the UK, although the use of the Parsonnet system is inappropriate and that the EuroSCORE system is a clear improvement, there are advantages in adopting a system based on a Bayesian model for risk assessment\",\"PeriodicalId\":208693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"19th IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS'06)\",\"volume\":\"321 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"19th IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS'06)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CBMS.2006.141\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"19th IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS'06)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CBMS.2006.141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们提出了在心脏外科实践监测中风险分层的必要性,并回顾了频率论和贝叶斯方法来解决这个问题。介绍了现有数据库的发展情况。对Parsonnet和EuroSCORE系统的改进进行了审查。我们认为,在英国,尽管使用Parsonnet系统是不合适的,而EuroSCORE系统是一个明显的改进,但采用基于贝叶斯模型的系统进行风险评估是有优势的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk Stratification in Assessing Risk in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
We present the need for risk stratification in the monitoring of cardiac surgical practice and review the frequentist and Bayesian approaches to the problem. Developments in the available databases are described. Enhancements to the Parsonnet and EuroSCORE systems are reviewed. We argue that in the UK, although the use of the Parsonnet system is inappropriate and that the EuroSCORE system is a clear improvement, there are advantages in adopting a system based on a Bayesian model for risk assessment
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信