法律术语“机器人”概念述评:作为《智能机器人发展与推广促进法》的改进方案

J. Kim
{"title":"法律术语“机器人”概念述评:作为《智能机器人发展与推广促进法》的改进方案","authors":"J. Kim","doi":"10.53066/mlr.2022.21.1.51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the importance of the role of the state in the development of modern science and technology does not require additional discussion, so the development of our country's robot industry will ask for continuous review to see whether the current robot industry promotion legislation has sufficient content for robot industry promotion or it can be improved. Such review work is also an essential part for the realization of the principle of the rule of law that state intervention should always be carried out under the support of appropriate laws. \nFor the effective conceptual regulation of “robot”, the target of policy, should be preceded to secure industrial competitiveness related to robot technology and promote policies for continuous development of robot industry, the study examines the appropriateness of the definition of “intelligent robot” of the current 「Intelligent Robots Development and Distribution Promotion Act」 - “The term \"intelligent robot\" means a mechanical device(including software required for operating the mechanical device) that perceives the external environment for itself, discerns circumstances, and moves voluntarily”(Article 2, 1.) - from the point of view of the analysis of systemicity(; Systematik) and understandability(Verständlichkeit) among the examination creteria of the legislative evaluation(Gesetzesevaluation). \nIn conclusion, the concept of “intelligent robot” in the current law does not mean much in the legal system and it is not easy to understand either. And there is also a risk of unnecessarily reducing the applicable scope of the law in practice. So there is a need of deleting the modifier “intelligent” and it is proposed to use a semi-exemplary definition of an exemplary arrangement of targets for the robot industry promotion and support policy based on the concept of “robot” from a more technical point of view,","PeriodicalId":398961,"journal":{"name":"Institute of Legal Myongji University","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Review on the Concept of “Robot” as a Legal Term: as an Improvement plan of 「Intelligent Robots Development and Distribution Promotion Act」\",\"authors\":\"J. Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.53066/mlr.2022.21.1.51\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As the importance of the role of the state in the development of modern science and technology does not require additional discussion, so the development of our country's robot industry will ask for continuous review to see whether the current robot industry promotion legislation has sufficient content for robot industry promotion or it can be improved. Such review work is also an essential part for the realization of the principle of the rule of law that state intervention should always be carried out under the support of appropriate laws. \\nFor the effective conceptual regulation of “robot”, the target of policy, should be preceded to secure industrial competitiveness related to robot technology and promote policies for continuous development of robot industry, the study examines the appropriateness of the definition of “intelligent robot” of the current 「Intelligent Robots Development and Distribution Promotion Act」 - “The term \\\"intelligent robot\\\" means a mechanical device(including software required for operating the mechanical device) that perceives the external environment for itself, discerns circumstances, and moves voluntarily”(Article 2, 1.) - from the point of view of the analysis of systemicity(; Systematik) and understandability(Verständlichkeit) among the examination creteria of the legislative evaluation(Gesetzesevaluation). \\nIn conclusion, the concept of “intelligent robot” in the current law does not mean much in the legal system and it is not easy to understand either. And there is also a risk of unnecessarily reducing the applicable scope of the law in practice. So there is a need of deleting the modifier “intelligent” and it is proposed to use a semi-exemplary definition of an exemplary arrangement of targets for the robot industry promotion and support policy based on the concept of “robot” from a more technical point of view,\",\"PeriodicalId\":398961,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Institute of Legal Myongji University\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Institute of Legal Myongji University\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53066/mlr.2022.21.1.51\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Institute of Legal Myongji University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53066/mlr.2022.21.1.51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于国家在现代科学技术发展中的作用的重要性不需要再赘述,所以我国机器人产业的发展将需要不断的审查,看看目前的机器人产业促进立法对于机器人产业的促进是否有足够的内容或者可以改进。这种审查工作也是实现国家干预始终在适当法律的支持下进行的法治原则的重要组成部分。首先要对政策目标“机器人”进行有效的概念调控,确保机器人技术相关的产业竞争力,推动政策推动机器人产业持续发展。本研究从系统性分析(;;)的角度,考察了现行《智能机器人开发与推广法》中“智能机器人”定义的适当性——“智能机器人”一词是指自行感知外部环境、辨别环境并自主移动的机械装置(包括操作机械装置所需的软件)”(第2条第1款)。系统性(Systematik)和可理解性(Verständlichkeit)是立法评价(Gesetzesevaluation)的考核标准之一。综上所述,现行法律中“智能机器人”的概念在法律体系中意义不大,也不容易理解。而且在实践中也存在不必要地缩小法律适用范围的风险。因此,有必要删去“智能”这一修饰语,并从更技术性的角度提出基于“机器人”概念的机器人产业促进与扶持政策的示范性目标安排的半示范性定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Review on the Concept of “Robot” as a Legal Term: as an Improvement plan of 「Intelligent Robots Development and Distribution Promotion Act」
As the importance of the role of the state in the development of modern science and technology does not require additional discussion, so the development of our country's robot industry will ask for continuous review to see whether the current robot industry promotion legislation has sufficient content for robot industry promotion or it can be improved. Such review work is also an essential part for the realization of the principle of the rule of law that state intervention should always be carried out under the support of appropriate laws. For the effective conceptual regulation of “robot”, the target of policy, should be preceded to secure industrial competitiveness related to robot technology and promote policies for continuous development of robot industry, the study examines the appropriateness of the definition of “intelligent robot” of the current 「Intelligent Robots Development and Distribution Promotion Act」 - “The term "intelligent robot" means a mechanical device(including software required for operating the mechanical device) that perceives the external environment for itself, discerns circumstances, and moves voluntarily”(Article 2, 1.) - from the point of view of the analysis of systemicity(; Systematik) and understandability(Verständlichkeit) among the examination creteria of the legislative evaluation(Gesetzesevaluation). In conclusion, the concept of “intelligent robot” in the current law does not mean much in the legal system and it is not easy to understand either. And there is also a risk of unnecessarily reducing the applicable scope of the law in practice. So there is a need of deleting the modifier “intelligent” and it is proposed to use a semi-exemplary definition of an exemplary arrangement of targets for the robot industry promotion and support policy based on the concept of “robot” from a more technical point of view,
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信