{"title":"论文综述样本","authors":"","doi":"10.1109/IPAS55744.2022.10052807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":" 1. Is the paper relevant to the conference topics? o very relevant 2. Is there any originality of the presented work? (5: high originality, ... 1: no originality) o (5) 3. How can you rate the structure of the paper? (5: well, ..., 1: poor) o (4) 4. How do you rate the appropriateness of the research/study method? ( 5: excellent,..., 1:poor) o (4) 5. How do you rate the relevance and clarity of drawings, figures and tables? ( 5: excellent, 1: poor) o (4) 6. How do you rate the appropriateness of the abstract as a description of the paper? ( 5: excellent, ..., 1:poor) o (4) 7. Are references adequate? recent? and correctly cited? (5: excellent,..., 1:poor) o (4) 8. Are discussions and conclusions appropriate? (5: excellent, ..., 1: poor) o (4) 9. Please, add some comments on the paper if you have any. o The paper is well written. Authors address the problem of audio signal augmentation based on Trans-GAN.","PeriodicalId":322228,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE 5th International Conference on Image Processing Applications and Systems (IPAS)","volume":"163 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Paper Review Samples\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IPAS55744.2022.10052807\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\" 1. Is the paper relevant to the conference topics? o very relevant 2. Is there any originality of the presented work? (5: high originality, ... 1: no originality) o (5) 3. How can you rate the structure of the paper? (5: well, ..., 1: poor) o (4) 4. How do you rate the appropriateness of the research/study method? ( 5: excellent,..., 1:poor) o (4) 5. How do you rate the relevance and clarity of drawings, figures and tables? ( 5: excellent, 1: poor) o (4) 6. How do you rate the appropriateness of the abstract as a description of the paper? ( 5: excellent, ..., 1:poor) o (4) 7. Are references adequate? recent? and correctly cited? (5: excellent,..., 1:poor) o (4) 8. Are discussions and conclusions appropriate? (5: excellent, ..., 1: poor) o (4) 9. Please, add some comments on the paper if you have any. o The paper is well written. Authors address the problem of audio signal augmentation based on Trans-GAN.\",\"PeriodicalId\":322228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE 5th International Conference on Image Processing Applications and Systems (IPAS)\",\"volume\":\"163 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE 5th International Conference on Image Processing Applications and Systems (IPAS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPAS55744.2022.10052807\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE 5th International Conference on Image Processing Applications and Systems (IPAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPAS55744.2022.10052807","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
1. Is the paper relevant to the conference topics? o very relevant 2. Is there any originality of the presented work? (5: high originality, ... 1: no originality) o (5) 3. How can you rate the structure of the paper? (5: well, ..., 1: poor) o (4) 4. How do you rate the appropriateness of the research/study method? ( 5: excellent,..., 1:poor) o (4) 5. How do you rate the relevance and clarity of drawings, figures and tables? ( 5: excellent, 1: poor) o (4) 6. How do you rate the appropriateness of the abstract as a description of the paper? ( 5: excellent, ..., 1:poor) o (4) 7. Are references adequate? recent? and correctly cited? (5: excellent,..., 1:poor) o (4) 8. Are discussions and conclusions appropriate? (5: excellent, ..., 1: poor) o (4) 9. Please, add some comments on the paper if you have any. o The paper is well written. Authors address the problem of audio signal augmentation based on Trans-GAN.