结合改良mallampati试验和甲状腺距离预测正常患者插管困难:一项前瞻性观察研究

L. Pathak, Prem Kumar Sah
{"title":"结合改良mallampati试验和甲状腺距离预测正常患者插管困难:一项前瞻性观察研究","authors":"L. Pathak, Prem Kumar Sah","doi":"10.33545/26649268.2020.v2.i1a.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Difficult intubation, often unexpected, remains a primary concern for the anesthesiologist. None of the bedside airway assessment tests have proven to be efficacious and highly predictive. This study was done to determine the sensitivity and specificity of Modified Mallampati test alone, Thyromental distance alone and in combination of both for predicting difficult intubation. Material and Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted in Universal College of Medical Sciences Teaching Hospital (UCMSTH), which involved 80 American Society of Anesthesiologist Physical Status (ASA PS) I patients undergoing elective surgeries under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. All patients were included for preoperative assessment by Modified Mallampati test alone and Thyromental distance measurement. The correlation between these tests and Cormack and Lehane laryngoscopic grading was done to find out the result. Results: Prediction of difficult intubation among 80 patients by Modified Mallampati test alone showed sensitivity of 72.7% and specificity of 98.6% whereas with Thyromental distance alone, showed sensitivity of 36.4% and specificity of 100%. When both predictors were combined, result showed sensitivity of 72.7% and specificity of 98.6% which was similar to that of Modified Mallampati test alone. Conclusion: This study concluded that sensitivity to predict difficult intubation was higher with Modified Mallampati test alone or in combination with Thyromental distance test whereas specificity was highest with Thyromental distance test alone.","PeriodicalId":322811,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Anesthesiology Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of difficult intubation in apparently normal patients by combining modified mallampati test and thyromental distance: A prospective observational study\",\"authors\":\"L. Pathak, Prem Kumar Sah\",\"doi\":\"10.33545/26649268.2020.v2.i1a.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Difficult intubation, often unexpected, remains a primary concern for the anesthesiologist. None of the bedside airway assessment tests have proven to be efficacious and highly predictive. This study was done to determine the sensitivity and specificity of Modified Mallampati test alone, Thyromental distance alone and in combination of both for predicting difficult intubation. Material and Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted in Universal College of Medical Sciences Teaching Hospital (UCMSTH), which involved 80 American Society of Anesthesiologist Physical Status (ASA PS) I patients undergoing elective surgeries under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. All patients were included for preoperative assessment by Modified Mallampati test alone and Thyromental distance measurement. The correlation between these tests and Cormack and Lehane laryngoscopic grading was done to find out the result. Results: Prediction of difficult intubation among 80 patients by Modified Mallampati test alone showed sensitivity of 72.7% and specificity of 98.6% whereas with Thyromental distance alone, showed sensitivity of 36.4% and specificity of 100%. When both predictors were combined, result showed sensitivity of 72.7% and specificity of 98.6% which was similar to that of Modified Mallampati test alone. Conclusion: This study concluded that sensitivity to predict difficult intubation was higher with Modified Mallampati test alone or in combination with Thyromental distance test whereas specificity was highest with Thyromental distance test alone.\",\"PeriodicalId\":322811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Anesthesiology Sciences\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Anesthesiology Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33545/26649268.2020.v2.i1a.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Anesthesiology Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33545/26649268.2020.v2.i1a.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

插管困难,往往是意想不到的,仍然是麻醉师主要关注的问题。没有一项床边气道评估试验被证明是有效和高度预测的。本研究旨在确定改良Mallampati试验单独、甲状腺距离单独及两者联合预测插管困难的敏感性和特异性。材料与方法:在美国医科大学附属教学医院(UCMSTH)进行了一项前瞻性观察研究,纳入80例在全身麻醉下气管插管行择期手术的美国麻醉医师身体状况学会(ASA PS) I级患者。所有患者术前均采用改良Mallampati试验和甲状腺距离测量进行评估。这些测试与Cormack和Lehane喉镜分级之间的相关性是为了找出结果。结果:单独应用改良Mallampati试验预测80例患者插管困难的敏感性为72.7%,特异性为98.6%;单独应用甲状腺距离试验预测插管困难的敏感性为36.4%,特异性为100%。两种预测指标联合使用时,敏感性为72.7%,特异性为98.6%,与单独使用改良Mallampati试验的结果相似。结论:单独使用改良Mallampati试验或联合甲状腺距离试验预测插管困难的敏感性较高,而单独使用甲状腺距离试验预测插管困难的特异性最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prediction of difficult intubation in apparently normal patients by combining modified mallampati test and thyromental distance: A prospective observational study
Introduction: Difficult intubation, often unexpected, remains a primary concern for the anesthesiologist. None of the bedside airway assessment tests have proven to be efficacious and highly predictive. This study was done to determine the sensitivity and specificity of Modified Mallampati test alone, Thyromental distance alone and in combination of both for predicting difficult intubation. Material and Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted in Universal College of Medical Sciences Teaching Hospital (UCMSTH), which involved 80 American Society of Anesthesiologist Physical Status (ASA PS) I patients undergoing elective surgeries under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. All patients were included for preoperative assessment by Modified Mallampati test alone and Thyromental distance measurement. The correlation between these tests and Cormack and Lehane laryngoscopic grading was done to find out the result. Results: Prediction of difficult intubation among 80 patients by Modified Mallampati test alone showed sensitivity of 72.7% and specificity of 98.6% whereas with Thyromental distance alone, showed sensitivity of 36.4% and specificity of 100%. When both predictors were combined, result showed sensitivity of 72.7% and specificity of 98.6% which was similar to that of Modified Mallampati test alone. Conclusion: This study concluded that sensitivity to predict difficult intubation was higher with Modified Mallampati test alone or in combination with Thyromental distance test whereas specificity was highest with Thyromental distance test alone.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信