{"title":"振幅比较单脉冲的二阶判别函数","authors":"E.E. Agrama, O. Abdel-Alim, M. Ezz-El-Arab","doi":"10.1109/IMTC.1990.65991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A novel three-receiving-elements amplitude comparison monopulse direction finding (DF) technique is introduced. An appropriate second-order discriminant function is chosen for this technique. Then simulation is used to compare its accuracy with that of the two-receiving-elements DF technique. Different sources of error were taken into consideration, such as receiver noise, pattern errors, amplitude imbalance, and mechanical and quantization errors. It is concluded that the three-receiving-elements amplitude comparison monopulse system is always more accurate than the two-elements system, especially around the receiving array axis.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":404761,"journal":{"name":"7th IEEE Conference on Instrumentation and Measurement Technology","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Second order discriminant function for amplitude comparison monopulse\",\"authors\":\"E.E. Agrama, O. Abdel-Alim, M. Ezz-El-Arab\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IMTC.1990.65991\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A novel three-receiving-elements amplitude comparison monopulse direction finding (DF) technique is introduced. An appropriate second-order discriminant function is chosen for this technique. Then simulation is used to compare its accuracy with that of the two-receiving-elements DF technique. Different sources of error were taken into consideration, such as receiver noise, pattern errors, amplitude imbalance, and mechanical and quantization errors. It is concluded that the three-receiving-elements amplitude comparison monopulse system is always more accurate than the two-elements system, especially around the receiving array axis.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":404761,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"7th IEEE Conference on Instrumentation and Measurement Technology\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"7th IEEE Conference on Instrumentation and Measurement Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IMTC.1990.65991\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"7th IEEE Conference on Instrumentation and Measurement Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IMTC.1990.65991","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Second order discriminant function for amplitude comparison monopulse
A novel three-receiving-elements amplitude comparison monopulse direction finding (DF) technique is introduced. An appropriate second-order discriminant function is chosen for this technique. Then simulation is used to compare its accuracy with that of the two-receiving-elements DF technique. Different sources of error were taken into consideration, such as receiver noise, pattern errors, amplitude imbalance, and mechanical and quantization errors. It is concluded that the three-receiving-elements amplitude comparison monopulse system is always more accurate than the two-elements system, especially around the receiving array axis.<>
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
