随机逼近驱动粒子群优化

S. Kiranyaz, T. Ince, M. Gabbouj
{"title":"随机逼近驱动粒子群优化","authors":"S. Kiranyaz, T. Ince, M. Gabbouj","doi":"10.1109/IIT.2009.5413787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) is attracting an ever-growing attention and more than ever it has found many application areas for many challenging optimization problems. In this paper, we draw the focus on a major drawback of the PSO algorithm: the poor gbest update. This can be a severe problem, which causes pre-mature convergence to local optima since gbest as the common term in the update equation of all particles, is the primary guide of the swarm. Therefore, we basically seek a solution for the social problem in PSO, i.e. “Who will guide the guide?” which resembles the rhetoric question posed by Plato in his famous work on government: “Who will guard the guards?” (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?). Stochastic approximation (SA) is purposefully adapted into two approaches to guide (or drive) the gbest particle (with simultaneous perturbation) towards the right direction with the gradient estimate of the underlying surface (or function) whilst avoiding local traps due to its stochastic nature. We purposefully used simultaneous perturbation SA (SPSA) for its low cost and since SPSA is applied only to the gbest (not the entire swarm), both approaches have thus a negligible overhead cost over the entire PSO process. Yet we have shown over a wide range of non-linear functions that both approaches significantly improve the performance of PSO especially if the parameters of SPSA suits to the problem in hand.","PeriodicalId":239829,"journal":{"name":"2009 International Conference on Innovations in Information Technology (IIT)","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stochastic approximation driven Particle Swarm Optimization\",\"authors\":\"S. Kiranyaz, T. Ince, M. Gabbouj\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IIT.2009.5413787\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) is attracting an ever-growing attention and more than ever it has found many application areas for many challenging optimization problems. In this paper, we draw the focus on a major drawback of the PSO algorithm: the poor gbest update. This can be a severe problem, which causes pre-mature convergence to local optima since gbest as the common term in the update equation of all particles, is the primary guide of the swarm. Therefore, we basically seek a solution for the social problem in PSO, i.e. “Who will guide the guide?” which resembles the rhetoric question posed by Plato in his famous work on government: “Who will guard the guards?” (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?). Stochastic approximation (SA) is purposefully adapted into two approaches to guide (or drive) the gbest particle (with simultaneous perturbation) towards the right direction with the gradient estimate of the underlying surface (or function) whilst avoiding local traps due to its stochastic nature. We purposefully used simultaneous perturbation SA (SPSA) for its low cost and since SPSA is applied only to the gbest (not the entire swarm), both approaches have thus a negligible overhead cost over the entire PSO process. Yet we have shown over a wide range of non-linear functions that both approaches significantly improve the performance of PSO especially if the parameters of SPSA suits to the problem in hand.\",\"PeriodicalId\":239829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 International Conference on Innovations in Information Technology (IIT)\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 International Conference on Innovations in Information Technology (IIT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IIT.2009.5413787\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 International Conference on Innovations in Information Technology (IIT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IIT.2009.5413787","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

粒子群算法(PSO)越来越受到人们的关注,并为许多具有挑战性的优化问题找到了许多应用领域。在本文中,我们将重点放在粒子群算法的一个主要缺点上:较差的最佳更新。这可能是一个严重的问题,因为gbest作为所有粒子更新方程中的共同项,是群的主要指南,它会导致早熟收敛到局部最优。因此,我们基本上在PSO中寻求一个解决社会问题的方法,即“谁来引导向导?”,这类似于柏拉图在其著名的政府著作中提出的修辞问题:“谁来守卫守卫?”(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)随机近似(SA)有目的地适应为两种方法来引导(或驱动)最佳粒子(同时受到扰动)朝着正确的方向与下表面(或函数)的梯度估计,同时避免由于其随机性而产生的局部陷阱。我们有目的地使用同步扰动SA (SPSA),因为它的成本低,而且由于SPSA仅应用于最佳(而不是整个群体),因此两种方法在整个PSO过程中的开销都可以忽略不计。然而,我们已经在广泛的非线性函数中表明,这两种方法都显著提高了粒子群算法的性能,特别是当SPSA的参数适合手头的问题时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stochastic approximation driven Particle Swarm Optimization
Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) is attracting an ever-growing attention and more than ever it has found many application areas for many challenging optimization problems. In this paper, we draw the focus on a major drawback of the PSO algorithm: the poor gbest update. This can be a severe problem, which causes pre-mature convergence to local optima since gbest as the common term in the update equation of all particles, is the primary guide of the swarm. Therefore, we basically seek a solution for the social problem in PSO, i.e. “Who will guide the guide?” which resembles the rhetoric question posed by Plato in his famous work on government: “Who will guard the guards?” (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?). Stochastic approximation (SA) is purposefully adapted into two approaches to guide (or drive) the gbest particle (with simultaneous perturbation) towards the right direction with the gradient estimate of the underlying surface (or function) whilst avoiding local traps due to its stochastic nature. We purposefully used simultaneous perturbation SA (SPSA) for its low cost and since SPSA is applied only to the gbest (not the entire swarm), both approaches have thus a negligible overhead cost over the entire PSO process. Yet we have shown over a wide range of non-linear functions that both approaches significantly improve the performance of PSO especially if the parameters of SPSA suits to the problem in hand.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信