约翰·济慈《拉米亚》中的浪漫幻想与怪诞

Małgorzata Łuczyńska-Hołdys
{"title":"约翰·济慈《拉米亚》中的浪漫幻想与怪诞","authors":"Małgorzata Łuczyńska-Hołdys","doi":"10.46585/absa.2022.15.2408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present article examines the notions of fantasy, illusion and logic in Keats’s romance Lamia (1819) from the perspective of the aesthetic and literary category of the grotesque. In his text Keats puts the grotesque to two uses. First, it serves to mark his ambiguous attitude to both reason and imagination as two exclusive modes of cognition; secondly, it records his uneasiness in relation to the romantic ideal of love. Two conflicting points of view inform and battle in the poem: one might be called Romantic, as it endorses imagination and beauty as values per se; the other invites an interrogation of the idealistic approach. Neither of these two perspectives is unequivocally applauded in the text, and the Romantic grotesque appears a perfect vehicle for expressing this incongruity.","PeriodicalId":158621,"journal":{"name":"American & British Studies Annual","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Romantic fantasy and the grotesque in John Keats’s “Lamia”\",\"authors\":\"Małgorzata Łuczyńska-Hołdys\",\"doi\":\"10.46585/absa.2022.15.2408\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present article examines the notions of fantasy, illusion and logic in Keats’s romance Lamia (1819) from the perspective of the aesthetic and literary category of the grotesque. In his text Keats puts the grotesque to two uses. First, it serves to mark his ambiguous attitude to both reason and imagination as two exclusive modes of cognition; secondly, it records his uneasiness in relation to the romantic ideal of love. Two conflicting points of view inform and battle in the poem: one might be called Romantic, as it endorses imagination and beauty as values per se; the other invites an interrogation of the idealistic approach. Neither of these two perspectives is unequivocally applauded in the text, and the Romantic grotesque appears a perfect vehicle for expressing this incongruity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":158621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American & British Studies Annual\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American & British Studies Annual\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46585/absa.2022.15.2408\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American & British Studies Annual","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46585/absa.2022.15.2408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从怪诞的美学和文学范畴的角度,考察了济慈的浪漫小说《拉米亚》(1819)中幻想、幻觉和逻辑的概念。在济慈的文章中,怪诞有两种用途。首先,它标志着他对理性和想象作为两种相互排斥的认识方式的模棱两可的态度;其次,它记录了他对浪漫爱情理想的不安。这首诗中有两种相互冲突的观点:一种可以被称为浪漫主义,因为它支持想象和美本身的价值;另一个则引发了对理想主义方法的质疑。这两种观点在文本中都没有得到明确的赞扬,浪漫主义怪诞似乎是表达这种不协调的完美载体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Romantic fantasy and the grotesque in John Keats’s “Lamia”
The present article examines the notions of fantasy, illusion and logic in Keats’s romance Lamia (1819) from the perspective of the aesthetic and literary category of the grotesque. In his text Keats puts the grotesque to two uses. First, it serves to mark his ambiguous attitude to both reason and imagination as two exclusive modes of cognition; secondly, it records his uneasiness in relation to the romantic ideal of love. Two conflicting points of view inform and battle in the poem: one might be called Romantic, as it endorses imagination and beauty as values per se; the other invites an interrogation of the idealistic approach. Neither of these two perspectives is unequivocally applauded in the text, and the Romantic grotesque appears a perfect vehicle for expressing this incongruity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信