Barbara Jachym
{"title":"Wojna na słowa z polityką i historią w tle – językowe aspekty słynnego sporu o Słowian","authors":"Barbara Jachym","doi":"10.15584/misroa.2022.43.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the linguistic analysis of the polemics conducted in the press by Józef Kostrzewski and Bolko von Richthofen in the interwar period. The scientific subject – the ethnogenesis of the Slavs – turned into a sharp political polemic. The set of analysed texts is an example of a discourse – a tangle of texts, thematically related, standing with each other and with the discourse in a complex relationship. The texts refer to each other through numerous quotations, paraphrases, references in the text and footnotes. Their analysis provided information about the image of us – Poles (Slavs) vs. they – Germans (Germani), we – Polish scientists vs. they – German researchers existing then, as well as information on language strategies used to create a specific image of oneself and the opponent. Since the controversy was conducted in public, it also affected the public perception of the discussed issue, while the socio-historical reality of the time also had an impact on the course of the debate. The closer the Second World War approached, the more heated the dispute became, and the more scientists moved away from the scientific problem and entered into sharp political polemics.","PeriodicalId":281758,"journal":{"name":"Materiały i Sprawozdania Rzeszowskiego Ośrodka Archeologicznego","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materiały i Sprawozdania Rzeszowskiego Ośrodka Archeologicznego","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15584/misroa.2022.43.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文致力于对Józef Kostrzewski和Bolko von Richthofen在两次世界大战期间在新闻界进行的论战进行语言学分析。这个科学课题——斯拉夫人的民族起源——变成了一场尖锐的政治论战。这组被分析的文本是一个话语的例子——一堆文本,主题相关,彼此站在一起,与话语处于复杂的关系中。文本通过大量的引用、释义、文本中的参考和脚注相互引用。他们的分析提供了关于我们-波兰人(斯拉夫人)vs.他们-德国人(日耳曼人),我们-波兰科学家vs.他们-当时的德国研究人员的形象的信息,以及用于创建自己和对手特定形象的语言策略的信息。由于争论是公开进行的,它也影响了公众对所讨论问题的看法,而当时的社会历史现实也对辩论的过程产生了影响。第二次世界大战越临近,争论就越激烈,越来越多的科学家从科学问题转移到尖锐的政治争论中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Wojna na słowa z polityką i historią w tle – językowe aspekty słynnego sporu o Słowian
The article is devoted to the linguistic analysis of the polemics conducted in the press by Józef Kostrzewski and Bolko von Richthofen in the interwar period. The scientific subject – the ethnogenesis of the Slavs – turned into a sharp political polemic. The set of analysed texts is an example of a discourse – a tangle of texts, thematically related, standing with each other and with the discourse in a complex relationship. The texts refer to each other through numerous quotations, paraphrases, references in the text and footnotes. Their analysis provided information about the image of us – Poles (Slavs) vs. they – Germans (Germani), we – Polish scientists vs. they – German researchers existing then, as well as information on language strategies used to create a specific image of oneself and the opponent. Since the controversy was conducted in public, it also affected the public perception of the discussed issue, while the socio-historical reality of the time also had an impact on the course of the debate. The closer the Second World War approached, the more heated the dispute became, and the more scientists moved away from the scientific problem and entered into sharp political polemics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信