应用根尖周、全景和计算机断层扫描评估牙前种植体骨质量

D. Shin, Kyeong-Mee Park, Jaejoon Hwang, W. Park, K. Kim
{"title":"应用根尖周、全景和计算机断层扫描评估牙前种植体骨质量","authors":"D. Shin, Kyeong-Mee Park, Jaejoon Hwang, W. Park, K. Kim","doi":"10.32542/IMPLANTOLOGY.20180007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Radiological evaluation of bone quality as well as the shape of the alveolar bone of the edentulous part to be placed is very important f or successf ul implant placement. Recently, threedimensional analysis using computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography has been actively used before implant surgery, but periapical and panoramic radiographs have been used for a long time to evaluate alveolar bone using low radiation doses. The purpose of this study was to compare the Hounsfield unit value of CT af ter dividing maxillary, mandibular, anterior, and posterior teeth into whether periapical and panoramic radiographs could be effectively used for bone quality evaluation. Materials and Methods: The periapical x-ray, panoramic x-ray, and conventional CT were taken from a total of 100 patients who have undergone the implant treatment. For 3D analysis, the virtual implants with a diameter of 4 mm and a length of 10 mm were placed in the implant planning software and the bone quality of 1 mm circumference was measured by Hounsfield unit value. Periapical x-ray and panoramic x-ray were also evaluated for bone quality. The degree of agreement among them was evaluated. Results: In 3D image analysis, reformatted cross-sectional, panoramic image analysis, bony quality evaluation similar to CT analysis was possible in maxillary anterior/posterior teeth with periapical Abstract Original Article","PeriodicalId":370954,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Implantology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Bone Quality in Pre-dental Implant Site Using Periapical, Panoramic and Computed Tomography\",\"authors\":\"D. Shin, Kyeong-Mee Park, Jaejoon Hwang, W. Park, K. Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.32542/IMPLANTOLOGY.20180007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: Radiological evaluation of bone quality as well as the shape of the alveolar bone of the edentulous part to be placed is very important f or successf ul implant placement. Recently, threedimensional analysis using computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography has been actively used before implant surgery, but periapical and panoramic radiographs have been used for a long time to evaluate alveolar bone using low radiation doses. The purpose of this study was to compare the Hounsfield unit value of CT af ter dividing maxillary, mandibular, anterior, and posterior teeth into whether periapical and panoramic radiographs could be effectively used for bone quality evaluation. Materials and Methods: The periapical x-ray, panoramic x-ray, and conventional CT were taken from a total of 100 patients who have undergone the implant treatment. For 3D analysis, the virtual implants with a diameter of 4 mm and a length of 10 mm were placed in the implant planning software and the bone quality of 1 mm circumference was measured by Hounsfield unit value. Periapical x-ray and panoramic x-ray were also evaluated for bone quality. The degree of agreement among them was evaluated. Results: In 3D image analysis, reformatted cross-sectional, panoramic image analysis, bony quality evaluation similar to CT analysis was possible in maxillary anterior/posterior teeth with periapical Abstract Original Article\",\"PeriodicalId\":370954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Implantology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Implantology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32542/IMPLANTOLOGY.20180007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Implantology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32542/IMPLANTOLOGY.20180007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:对无牙部分的骨质量及牙槽骨形态进行影像学评价对种植体植入的成功至关重要。近年来,使用计算机断层扫描和锥形束计算机断层扫描进行三维分析已在种植体手术前得到积极应用,但长期以来,使用低辐射剂量的根尖周和全景x线片对牙槽骨进行评估。本研究的目的是比较上颌、下颌、前牙和后牙划分后CT的Hounsfield单位值,以确定根尖周片和全景片是否可以有效地用于骨质量评价。材料与方法:对100例接受种植治疗的患者进行根尖周x线、全景x线及常规CT检查。在三维分析中,将直径为4 mm、长度为10 mm的虚拟种植体放入种植体规划软件中,采用Hounsfield单位值测量周长为1 mm的骨质量。根尖周x线和全景x线评价骨质量。评估了它们之间的一致程度。结果:在三维图像分析、重构横切面图像分析、全景图像分析中,可以对尖周上颌前/后牙进行类似于CT分析的骨质量评价
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of Bone Quality in Pre-dental Implant Site Using Periapical, Panoramic and Computed Tomography
Purpose: Radiological evaluation of bone quality as well as the shape of the alveolar bone of the edentulous part to be placed is very important f or successf ul implant placement. Recently, threedimensional analysis using computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography has been actively used before implant surgery, but periapical and panoramic radiographs have been used for a long time to evaluate alveolar bone using low radiation doses. The purpose of this study was to compare the Hounsfield unit value of CT af ter dividing maxillary, mandibular, anterior, and posterior teeth into whether periapical and panoramic radiographs could be effectively used for bone quality evaluation. Materials and Methods: The periapical x-ray, panoramic x-ray, and conventional CT were taken from a total of 100 patients who have undergone the implant treatment. For 3D analysis, the virtual implants with a diameter of 4 mm and a length of 10 mm were placed in the implant planning software and the bone quality of 1 mm circumference was measured by Hounsfield unit value. Periapical x-ray and panoramic x-ray were also evaluated for bone quality. The degree of agreement among them was evaluated. Results: In 3D image analysis, reformatted cross-sectional, panoramic image analysis, bony quality evaluation similar to CT analysis was possible in maxillary anterior/posterior teeth with periapical Abstract Original Article
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信