对《国家纪念研究所法》第55a条的批判性分析-起诉危害波兰民族罪行委员会(法律上的克减)

Karolina Palka-Stolorz
{"title":"对《国家纪念研究所法》第55a条的批判性分析-起诉危害波兰民族罪行委员会(法律上的克减)","authors":"Karolina Palka-Stolorz","doi":"10.12775/sit.2022.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is presenting the Holocaust denial crime under Article 55a of the Act on the Institute of National Remembrance, which was widely criticized during the 73rd anniversary of the liberation of the former Nazi concentration camp Auschwitz-Birkenau. The introduction to the text presents the circumstances surrounding the passing of this provision, its main assumptions, as well as the opinions of particular persons about it. The study is dominated by the dogmatic method of conceiving the legal text, with elements of functional analysis. The legal part of the study includes an analysis of particular terms contained in the provision. In the next one, examples of other countries where denial of Nazi crimes is punishable are indicated. In the last part of the study, a summary can be found, containing the most important conclusions from the study.","PeriodicalId":445759,"journal":{"name":"Studia Iuridica Toruniensia","volume":"15 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Critical Analysis of Article 55a of The Act on the Institute of National Remembrance – Commission for the Prosecution of Crimes against the Polish Nation (de lege derogata)\",\"authors\":\"Karolina Palka-Stolorz\",\"doi\":\"10.12775/sit.2022.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article is presenting the Holocaust denial crime under Article 55a of the Act on the Institute of National Remembrance, which was widely criticized during the 73rd anniversary of the liberation of the former Nazi concentration camp Auschwitz-Birkenau. The introduction to the text presents the circumstances surrounding the passing of this provision, its main assumptions, as well as the opinions of particular persons about it. The study is dominated by the dogmatic method of conceiving the legal text, with elements of functional analysis. The legal part of the study includes an analysis of particular terms contained in the provision. In the next one, examples of other countries where denial of Nazi crimes is punishable are indicated. In the last part of the study, a summary can be found, containing the most important conclusions from the study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":445759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studia Iuridica Toruniensia\",\"volume\":\"15 1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studia Iuridica Toruniensia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12775/sit.2022.019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Iuridica Toruniensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12775/sit.2022.019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在奥斯威辛-比克瑙集中营解放73周年之际,受到广泛批评的《国家纪念研究所法》第55a条规定了否认大屠杀罪。案文的导言介绍了通过这一规定的情况、其主要假设以及某些人对此的意见。该研究以教条式的理解法律文本的方法为主,并带有功能分析的成分。研究报告的法律部分包括对条款中所载的特定条款的分析。在下一份报告中,列举了否认纳粹罪行应予惩处的其他国家的例子。在研究的最后一部分,可以找到一个总结,其中包含了研究中最重要的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Critical Analysis of Article 55a of The Act on the Institute of National Remembrance – Commission for the Prosecution of Crimes against the Polish Nation (de lege derogata)
This article is presenting the Holocaust denial crime under Article 55a of the Act on the Institute of National Remembrance, which was widely criticized during the 73rd anniversary of the liberation of the former Nazi concentration camp Auschwitz-Birkenau. The introduction to the text presents the circumstances surrounding the passing of this provision, its main assumptions, as well as the opinions of particular persons about it. The study is dominated by the dogmatic method of conceiving the legal text, with elements of functional analysis. The legal part of the study includes an analysis of particular terms contained in the provision. In the next one, examples of other countries where denial of Nazi crimes is punishable are indicated. In the last part of the study, a summary can be found, containing the most important conclusions from the study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信