事件与实体的共同引用:语境和引用表达形式的影响

S. Loáiciga, L. Bevacqua, H. Rohde, Christian Hardmeier
{"title":"事件与实体的共同引用:语境和引用表达形式的影响","authors":"S. Loáiciga, L. Bevacqua, H. Rohde, Christian Hardmeier","doi":"10.18653/v1/W18-0711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Anaphora resolution systems require both an enumeration of possible candidate antecedents and an identification process of the antecedent. This paper focuses on (i) the impact of the form of referring expression on entity-vs-event preferences and (ii) how properties of the passage interact with referential form. Two crowd-sourced story-continuation experiments were conducted, using constructed and naturally-occurring passages, to see how participants interpret It and This pronouns following a context sentence that makes available event and entity referents. Our participants show a strong, but not categorical, bias to use This to refer to events and It to refer to entities. However, these preferences vary with passage characteristics such as verb class (a proxy in our constructed examples for the number of explicit and implicit entities) and more subtle author intentions regarding subsequent re-mention (the original event-vs-entity re-mention of our corpus items).","PeriodicalId":431101,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the First Workshop on Computational Models of\n Reference, Anaphora and Coreference","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Event versus entity co-reference: Effects of context and form of referring expression\",\"authors\":\"S. Loáiciga, L. Bevacqua, H. Rohde, Christian Hardmeier\",\"doi\":\"10.18653/v1/W18-0711\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Anaphora resolution systems require both an enumeration of possible candidate antecedents and an identification process of the antecedent. This paper focuses on (i) the impact of the form of referring expression on entity-vs-event preferences and (ii) how properties of the passage interact with referential form. Two crowd-sourced story-continuation experiments were conducted, using constructed and naturally-occurring passages, to see how participants interpret It and This pronouns following a context sentence that makes available event and entity referents. Our participants show a strong, but not categorical, bias to use This to refer to events and It to refer to entities. However, these preferences vary with passage characteristics such as verb class (a proxy in our constructed examples for the number of explicit and implicit entities) and more subtle author intentions regarding subsequent re-mention (the original event-vs-entity re-mention of our corpus items).\",\"PeriodicalId\":431101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the First Workshop on Computational Models of\\n Reference, Anaphora and Coreference\",\"volume\":\"93 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the First Workshop on Computational Models of\\n Reference, Anaphora and Coreference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W18-0711\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the First Workshop on Computational Models of\n Reference, Anaphora and Coreference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W18-0711","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

回指解析系统既需要对可能的候选先行词进行枚举,也需要对先行词进行识别。本文主要关注(i)指称表达形式对实体与事件偏好的影响,以及(ii)文章属性如何与指称表达形式相互作用。研究人员进行了两项由人群参与的故事延续实验,分别使用构建好的和自然发生的段落,观察参与者如何在提供事件和实体指称的上下文句子后解释It和This代词。我们的参与者表现出强烈的,但不是绝对的,倾向于用This来指代事件,用It来指代实体。然而,这些偏好会随着段落特征而变化,比如动词类(在我们构建的示例中表示显式和隐式实体数量的代理),以及作者对随后重新提及的更微妙的意图(语料库项目的原始事件对实体的重新提及)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Event versus entity co-reference: Effects of context and form of referring expression
Anaphora resolution systems require both an enumeration of possible candidate antecedents and an identification process of the antecedent. This paper focuses on (i) the impact of the form of referring expression on entity-vs-event preferences and (ii) how properties of the passage interact with referential form. Two crowd-sourced story-continuation experiments were conducted, using constructed and naturally-occurring passages, to see how participants interpret It and This pronouns following a context sentence that makes available event and entity referents. Our participants show a strong, but not categorical, bias to use This to refer to events and It to refer to entities. However, these preferences vary with passage characteristics such as verb class (a proxy in our constructed examples for the number of explicit and implicit entities) and more subtle author intentions regarding subsequent re-mention (the original event-vs-entity re-mention of our corpus items).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信