比较传统的公共交通和叫车应用:马尼拉大都会的用户体验快照

Godofredo Ramizo
{"title":"比较传统的公共交通和叫车应用:马尼拉大都会的用户体验快照","authors":"Godofredo Ramizo","doi":"10.2991/icsgs-18.2019.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ride apps offer alternative and controversial solutions to commuters in Manila, a Southeast Asian megacity characterized by inadequacies in transport infrastructure and law enforcement capabilities. In the literature, there is scarce empirical analysis of how ride-hailing technologies compare with pre-existing conventional transport systems from the perspective of the users of the technologies. To address this gap, this paper employs in-depth semi-structured interviews with respondents from Manila to examine the issues encountered by users of the conventional transport systems and how they perceive these in comparison to their experiences with ride-hailing technologies. These comparison-driven narratives are important, as they can inform subsequent studies on what motivates the patterns of use and attitudes toward pre-existing systems and new technology-driven entrants. The analysis presented in this paper is a provisional snapshot of a work in progress on the phenomenon of ridehailing apps operating in Southeast Asian megacities. Keywords—public transportation, urban mobility, ridehailing apps, Manila transportation","PeriodicalId":153335,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Strategic and Global Studies (ICSGS 2018)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing conventional public transport to ride-hailing apps: A snapshot of user experiences from Metro Manila\",\"authors\":\"Godofredo Ramizo\",\"doi\":\"10.2991/icsgs-18.2019.21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ride apps offer alternative and controversial solutions to commuters in Manila, a Southeast Asian megacity characterized by inadequacies in transport infrastructure and law enforcement capabilities. In the literature, there is scarce empirical analysis of how ride-hailing technologies compare with pre-existing conventional transport systems from the perspective of the users of the technologies. To address this gap, this paper employs in-depth semi-structured interviews with respondents from Manila to examine the issues encountered by users of the conventional transport systems and how they perceive these in comparison to their experiences with ride-hailing technologies. These comparison-driven narratives are important, as they can inform subsequent studies on what motivates the patterns of use and attitudes toward pre-existing systems and new technology-driven entrants. The analysis presented in this paper is a provisional snapshot of a work in progress on the phenomenon of ridehailing apps operating in Southeast Asian megacities. Keywords—public transportation, urban mobility, ridehailing apps, Manila transportation\",\"PeriodicalId\":153335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Strategic and Global Studies (ICSGS 2018)\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Strategic and Global Studies (ICSGS 2018)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2991/icsgs-18.2019.21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Strategic and Global Studies (ICSGS 2018)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/icsgs-18.2019.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在交通基础设施和执法能力不足的东南亚特大城市马尼拉,打车应用为通勤者提供了另一种有争议的解决方案。在文献中,很少有从技术用户的角度对网约车技术与已有的传统交通系统进行比较的实证分析。为了解决这一差距,本文对马尼拉的受访者进行了深入的半结构化访谈,以研究传统交通系统用户遇到的问题,以及与他们使用网约车技术的经验相比,他们如何看待这些问题。这些比较驱动的叙述很重要,因为它们可以为后续的研究提供信息,了解是什么激发了使用模式以及对现有系统和新技术驱动的进入者的态度。本文中提出的分析是对东南亚大城市中运营的乘车应用程序现象的临时快照。关键词:公共交通,城市交通,打车软件,马尼拉交通
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing conventional public transport to ride-hailing apps: A snapshot of user experiences from Metro Manila
Ride apps offer alternative and controversial solutions to commuters in Manila, a Southeast Asian megacity characterized by inadequacies in transport infrastructure and law enforcement capabilities. In the literature, there is scarce empirical analysis of how ride-hailing technologies compare with pre-existing conventional transport systems from the perspective of the users of the technologies. To address this gap, this paper employs in-depth semi-structured interviews with respondents from Manila to examine the issues encountered by users of the conventional transport systems and how they perceive these in comparison to their experiences with ride-hailing technologies. These comparison-driven narratives are important, as they can inform subsequent studies on what motivates the patterns of use and attitudes toward pre-existing systems and new technology-driven entrants. The analysis presented in this paper is a provisional snapshot of a work in progress on the phenomenon of ridehailing apps operating in Southeast Asian megacities. Keywords—public transportation, urban mobility, ridehailing apps, Manila transportation
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信