论《继承法》和《家事法》条款的反法律解释

A. V. Fioshin
{"title":"论《继承法》和《家事法》条款的反法律解释","authors":"A. V. Fioshin","doi":"10.18572/1813-1204-2023-2-32-38","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to such a kind of interpretation of the norms of hereditary and family legislation as contra legem. The reasons for the existence of this kind of interpretation are indicated. The position on its inadmissibility is analyzed. Examples of contra legem interpretation of the norms of inheritance and family legislation by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and lower courts are considered. The question of whether it is possible to put an equal sign between the type of interpretation under consideration and the analogy of the law is investigated. It is concluded that the interpretation of contra legem is rarely used by courts and is based on relevant principles of law.","PeriodicalId":214894,"journal":{"name":"Notary","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Contra Legem Interpretation of the Provisions of Inheritance and Family Laws\",\"authors\":\"A. V. Fioshin\",\"doi\":\"10.18572/1813-1204-2023-2-32-38\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article is devoted to such a kind of interpretation of the norms of hereditary and family legislation as contra legem. The reasons for the existence of this kind of interpretation are indicated. The position on its inadmissibility is analyzed. Examples of contra legem interpretation of the norms of inheritance and family legislation by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and lower courts are considered. The question of whether it is possible to put an equal sign between the type of interpretation under consideration and the analogy of the law is investigated. It is concluded that the interpretation of contra legem is rarely used by courts and is based on relevant principles of law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":214894,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Notary\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Notary\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18572/1813-1204-2023-2-32-38\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Notary","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1813-1204-2023-2-32-38","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文致力于对这种作为反法律的世袭和家庭立法规范的解释。指出了这种解释存在的原因。分析了其不可采信性的立场。本文审议了俄罗斯联邦最高法院和下级法院对继承和家庭立法规范的反法律解释的例子。在考虑的解释类型和法律的类比之间是否可能放置一个等号的问题进行了研究。本文认为,反法律解释很少被法院采用,其依据是相关的法律原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On Contra Legem Interpretation of the Provisions of Inheritance and Family Laws
The article is devoted to such a kind of interpretation of the norms of hereditary and family legislation as contra legem. The reasons for the existence of this kind of interpretation are indicated. The position on its inadmissibility is analyzed. Examples of contra legem interpretation of the norms of inheritance and family legislation by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and lower courts are considered. The question of whether it is possible to put an equal sign between the type of interpretation under consideration and the analogy of the law is investigated. It is concluded that the interpretation of contra legem is rarely used by courts and is based on relevant principles of law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信