密码协议的一阶验证器

Ernie Cohen
{"title":"密码协议的一阶验证器","authors":"Ernie Cohen","doi":"10.1109/CSFW.2000.856933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We describe a proof method for cryptographic protocols, based on a strong secrecy invariant that catalogues conditions under which messages can be published. For typical protocols, a suitable first-order invariant can be generated automatically from the program text, independent of the properties being verified, allowing safety properties to be proved by ordinary first-order reasoning. We have implemented the method in an automatic verifier, TAPS, that proves safety properties roughly equivalent to those in published Isabelle verifications, but does so much faster (usually within a few seconds) and with little or no guidance from the user. We have used TAPS to analyze about 60 protocols, including all but three protocols from the Clark and Jacob survey; on average, these verifications each require less than 4 seconds of CPU time and less than 4 bytes of hints from the user.","PeriodicalId":377637,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 13th IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop. CSFW-13","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"85","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TAPS: a first-order verifier for cryptographic protocols\",\"authors\":\"Ernie Cohen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CSFW.2000.856933\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We describe a proof method for cryptographic protocols, based on a strong secrecy invariant that catalogues conditions under which messages can be published. For typical protocols, a suitable first-order invariant can be generated automatically from the program text, independent of the properties being verified, allowing safety properties to be proved by ordinary first-order reasoning. We have implemented the method in an automatic verifier, TAPS, that proves safety properties roughly equivalent to those in published Isabelle verifications, but does so much faster (usually within a few seconds) and with little or no guidance from the user. We have used TAPS to analyze about 60 protocols, including all but three protocols from the Clark and Jacob survey; on average, these verifications each require less than 4 seconds of CPU time and less than 4 bytes of hints from the user.\",\"PeriodicalId\":377637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings 13th IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop. CSFW-13\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"85\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings 13th IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop. CSFW-13\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSFW.2000.856933\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 13th IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop. CSFW-13","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSFW.2000.856933","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 85

摘要

我们描述了一种基于强保密不变量的加密协议证明方法,该不变量对消息可以发布的条件进行了分类。对于典型的协议,可以从程序文本自动生成合适的一阶不变量,独立于被验证的属性,从而允许通过普通的一阶推理来证明安全属性。我们已经在自动验证器TAPS中实现了该方法,该方法证明了与已发布的Isabelle验证大致相同的安全属性,但速度更快(通常在几秒钟内),并且很少或根本没有用户的指导。我们已经使用TAPS分析了大约60个协议,包括Clark和Jacob调查中的所有协议,只有三个协议除外;平均而言,这些验证每次只需要不到4秒的CPU时间和不到4字节的用户提示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
TAPS: a first-order verifier for cryptographic protocols
We describe a proof method for cryptographic protocols, based on a strong secrecy invariant that catalogues conditions under which messages can be published. For typical protocols, a suitable first-order invariant can be generated automatically from the program text, independent of the properties being verified, allowing safety properties to be proved by ordinary first-order reasoning. We have implemented the method in an automatic verifier, TAPS, that proves safety properties roughly equivalent to those in published Isabelle verifications, but does so much faster (usually within a few seconds) and with little or no guidance from the user. We have used TAPS to analyze about 60 protocols, including all but three protocols from the Clark and Jacob survey; on average, these verifications each require less than 4 seconds of CPU time and less than 4 bytes of hints from the user.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信