爱尔兰数字资源库

G. Pierantoni, D. Frost, K. Cassidy, S. Kenny, J. O'neill, P. Tiernan, E. Kilfeather
{"title":"爱尔兰数字资源库","authors":"G. Pierantoni, D. Frost, K. Cassidy, S. Kenny, J. O'neill, P. Tiernan, E. Kilfeather","doi":"10.1109/IWSG.2015.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Digital Repository of Ireland is a trusted digital repository that contributes to a national digital infrastructure for the humanities and social sciences in Ireland. Although trusted digital repositories are not mainstream application in the domain of science gateways and the social sciences are not the usual domain for a science gateway we argue in this paper that DRI has many of the principal characteristics of a science gateway and that the domain of social science will benefit in the future from the same advantages that other more numerical-based disciplines reap from science gateways. In addition to offering tools to ingest vast amounts of heterogeneous data sets, a trusted digital repository must offer specific functionalities regarding persistence and trustworthiness of the stored data sets. Trusted digital repositories must maintain the information for a long period and this entails precise and at times difficult choices in the architecture and implementation details. Another facet in which DRI (and most TDRs) differ from mainstream science gateways is the relationship between data and metadata, in many science gateways, metadata is created from the automated analysis of data sets, while in DRI much of the metadata is manually defined by specialised users. Furthermore, as the data sets are heterogeneous in nature, the metadata used for their description is of crucial importance. In this paper we argue that TDRs such as DRI, will play an increasingly important role in the future of the social science community and that they constitute the modern equivalent of the great libraries of the past, places in which knowledge was kept and preserved to be available to researchers of the present and the future. Furthermore, although DRI is far from being the only Trusted Digital Repository available, we argue that certaing design decision such as the support of multiple metadata standards and its modular nature, make it an interesting example of a flexible TDR.","PeriodicalId":341012,"journal":{"name":"2015 7th International Workshop on Science Gateways","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Digital Repository of Ireland\",\"authors\":\"G. Pierantoni, D. Frost, K. Cassidy, S. Kenny, J. O'neill, P. Tiernan, E. Kilfeather\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IWSG.2015.17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Digital Repository of Ireland is a trusted digital repository that contributes to a national digital infrastructure for the humanities and social sciences in Ireland. Although trusted digital repositories are not mainstream application in the domain of science gateways and the social sciences are not the usual domain for a science gateway we argue in this paper that DRI has many of the principal characteristics of a science gateway and that the domain of social science will benefit in the future from the same advantages that other more numerical-based disciplines reap from science gateways. In addition to offering tools to ingest vast amounts of heterogeneous data sets, a trusted digital repository must offer specific functionalities regarding persistence and trustworthiness of the stored data sets. Trusted digital repositories must maintain the information for a long period and this entails precise and at times difficult choices in the architecture and implementation details. Another facet in which DRI (and most TDRs) differ from mainstream science gateways is the relationship between data and metadata, in many science gateways, metadata is created from the automated analysis of data sets, while in DRI much of the metadata is manually defined by specialised users. Furthermore, as the data sets are heterogeneous in nature, the metadata used for their description is of crucial importance. In this paper we argue that TDRs such as DRI, will play an increasingly important role in the future of the social science community and that they constitute the modern equivalent of the great libraries of the past, places in which knowledge was kept and preserved to be available to researchers of the present and the future. Furthermore, although DRI is far from being the only Trusted Digital Repository available, we argue that certaing design decision such as the support of multiple metadata standards and its modular nature, make it an interesting example of a flexible TDR.\",\"PeriodicalId\":341012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 7th International Workshop on Science Gateways\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 7th International Workshop on Science Gateways\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IWSG.2015.17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 7th International Workshop on Science Gateways","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IWSG.2015.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

爱尔兰数字资源库是一个值得信赖的数字资源库,为爱尔兰的人文和社会科学国家数字基础设施做出了贡献。尽管可信的数字存储库不是科学网关领域的主流应用,社会科学也不是科学网关的通常领域,但我们在本文中认为,DRI具有科学网关的许多主要特征,并且社会科学领域将在未来受益于其他更多基于数字的学科从科学网关中获得的相同优势。除了提供摄取大量异构数据集的工具之外,受信任的数字存储库还必须提供关于存储数据集的持久性和可信度的特定功能。可信的数字存储库必须长时间维护信息,这需要在体系结构和实现细节方面做出精确的、有时是困难的选择。DRI(和大多数tdr)与主流科学网关不同的另一个方面是数据和元数据之间的关系,在许多科学网关中,元数据是通过对数据集的自动分析创建的,而在DRI中,大部分元数据是由专门的用户手动定义的。此外,由于数据集本质上是异构的,因此用于描述它们的元数据至关重要。在本文中,我们认为,像DRI这样的tdr将在社会科学界的未来发挥越来越重要的作用,它们构成了过去伟大图书馆的现代等量,在这些图书馆中保存和保存了知识,供现在和未来的研究人员使用。此外,尽管DRI远不是唯一可用的可信数字存储库,但我们认为某些设计决策,如支持多种元数据标准及其模块化特性,使其成为灵活的TDR的有趣示例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Digital Repository of Ireland
The Digital Repository of Ireland is a trusted digital repository that contributes to a national digital infrastructure for the humanities and social sciences in Ireland. Although trusted digital repositories are not mainstream application in the domain of science gateways and the social sciences are not the usual domain for a science gateway we argue in this paper that DRI has many of the principal characteristics of a science gateway and that the domain of social science will benefit in the future from the same advantages that other more numerical-based disciplines reap from science gateways. In addition to offering tools to ingest vast amounts of heterogeneous data sets, a trusted digital repository must offer specific functionalities regarding persistence and trustworthiness of the stored data sets. Trusted digital repositories must maintain the information for a long period and this entails precise and at times difficult choices in the architecture and implementation details. Another facet in which DRI (and most TDRs) differ from mainstream science gateways is the relationship between data and metadata, in many science gateways, metadata is created from the automated analysis of data sets, while in DRI much of the metadata is manually defined by specialised users. Furthermore, as the data sets are heterogeneous in nature, the metadata used for their description is of crucial importance. In this paper we argue that TDRs such as DRI, will play an increasingly important role in the future of the social science community and that they constitute the modern equivalent of the great libraries of the past, places in which knowledge was kept and preserved to be available to researchers of the present and the future. Furthermore, although DRI is far from being the only Trusted Digital Repository available, we argue that certaing design decision such as the support of multiple metadata standards and its modular nature, make it an interesting example of a flexible TDR.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信