私有IaaS云:OpenNebula、CloudStack和OpenStack的比较分析

2016 24th Euromicro International Conference on Parallel, Distributed, and Network-Based Processing (PDP) Pub Date : 2016-02-01 DOI:10.1109/PDP.2016.75

Adriano Vogel, Dalvan Griebler, Carlos A. F. Maron, C. Schepke, L. G. Fernandes

{"title":"私有IaaS云:OpenNebula、CloudStack和OpenStack的比较分析","authors":"Adriano Vogel, Dalvan Griebler, Carlos A. F. Maron, C. Schepke, L. G. Fernandes","doi":"10.1109/PDP.2016.75","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the evolution of cloud computing in recent years, the performance and comprehensive understanding of the available private cloud tools are still under research. This paper contributes to an analysis of the Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) domain by mapping new insights and discussing the challenges for improving cloud services. The goal is to make a comparative analysis of OpenNebula, OpenStack and CloudStack tools, evaluating their differences on support for flexibility and resiliency. Also, we aim at evaluating these three cloud tools when they are deployed using a mutual hypervisor (KVM) for discovering new empirical insights. Our research results demonstrated that OpenStack is the most resilient and CloudStack is the most flexible for deploying an IaaS private cloud. Moreover, the performance experiments indicated some contrasts among the private IaaS cloud instances when running intensive workloads and scientific applications.","PeriodicalId":192273,"journal":{"name":"2016 24th Euromicro International Conference on Parallel, Distributed, and Network-Based Processing (PDP)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"39","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Private IaaS Clouds: A Comparative Analysis of OpenNebula, CloudStack and OpenStack\",\"authors\":\"Adriano Vogel, Dalvan Griebler, Carlos A. F. Maron, C. Schepke, L. G. Fernandes\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PDP.2016.75\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite the evolution of cloud computing in recent years, the performance and comprehensive understanding of the available private cloud tools are still under research. This paper contributes to an analysis of the Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) domain by mapping new insights and discussing the challenges for improving cloud services. The goal is to make a comparative analysis of OpenNebula, OpenStack and CloudStack tools, evaluating their differences on support for flexibility and resiliency. Also, we aim at evaluating these three cloud tools when they are deployed using a mutual hypervisor (KVM) for discovering new empirical insights. Our research results demonstrated that OpenStack is the most resilient and CloudStack is the most flexible for deploying an IaaS private cloud. Moreover, the performance experiments indicated some contrasts among the private IaaS cloud instances when running intensive workloads and scientific applications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":192273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 24th Euromicro International Conference on Parallel, Distributed, and Network-Based Processing (PDP)\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"39\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 24th Euromicro International Conference on Parallel, Distributed, and Network-Based Processing (PDP)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PDP.2016.75\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 24th Euromicro International Conference on Parallel, Distributed, and Network-Based Processing (PDP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PDP.2016.75","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 39

摘要

尽管近年来云计算得到了发展，但对可用私有云工具的性能和全面理解仍处于研究阶段。本文通过映射新的见解和讨论改进云服务的挑战，对基础设施即服务(IaaS)领域进行了分析。我们的目标是对OpenNebula、OpenStack和CloudStack工具进行比较分析，评估它们在灵活性和弹性支持方面的差异。此外，我们的目标是在使用共同管理程序(KVM)部署这三种云工具时对它们进行评估，以发现新的经验见解。我们的研究结果表明，OpenStack是最具弹性的，而CloudStack是部署IaaS私有云最灵活的。此外，性能实验表明，在运行密集型工作负载和科学应用程序时，私有IaaS云实例之间存在一些差异。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Private IaaS Clouds: A Comparative Analysis of OpenNebula, CloudStack and OpenStack

Despite the evolution of cloud computing in recent years, the performance and comprehensive understanding of the available private cloud tools are still under research. This paper contributes to an analysis of the Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) domain by mapping new insights and discussing the challenges for improving cloud services. The goal is to make a comparative analysis of OpenNebula, OpenStack and CloudStack tools, evaluating their differences on support for flexibility and resiliency. Also, we aim at evaluating these three cloud tools when they are deployed using a mutual hypervisor (KVM) for discovering new empirical insights. Our research results demonstrated that OpenStack is the most resilient and CloudStack is the most flexible for deploying an IaaS private cloud. Moreover, the performance experiments indicated some contrasts among the private IaaS cloud instances when running intensive workloads and scientific applications.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

2016 24th Euromicro International Conference on Parallel, Distributed, and Network-Based Processing (PDP)

自引率

0.00%

发文量