精神错乱辩护在尼日利亚法庭的适用:缺失的一环

C. Ewhrudjakpor
{"title":"精神错乱辩护在尼日利亚法庭的适用:缺失的一环","authors":"C. Ewhrudjakpor","doi":"10.4314/NJPSYC.V7I2.50115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There is a huge controversy over failed applications of psychological principles and techniques to the trials of offenders who are mentally ill in Nigerian courts. Aim: This paper is aimed at appraising the import of forensic psychology to the legal trials of mentally ill people. Method: Nigeria laws are replete with Criminal Codes and Criminal Procedure Acts but there are numerous failed cases of insanity defences in Nigeria. The research technique of content analysis of insanity defences in Nigeria shows that there is a missing link. Results: That broken link is the application of forensic psychology using a battery of standardized instruments, validated and culture free, handled by unbiased and incorruptible forensic experts. Conclusion: it was concluded that expert psychiatric testimony can play a significant role in the ultimate verdict, in insanity trials in Nigeria. This finding was explained with the classical positivist school by Lombroso. This author suggested that this broken link be fixed by the Courts deliberately involving forensic experts and their reports in passing judgments. Keywords: Nigeria; Defence; Insanity; Law Courts; Psychiatry","PeriodicalId":422969,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"150 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of Defence of Insanity in Nigerian Courts: The Missing Link\",\"authors\":\"C. Ewhrudjakpor\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/NJPSYC.V7I2.50115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: There is a huge controversy over failed applications of psychological principles and techniques to the trials of offenders who are mentally ill in Nigerian courts. Aim: This paper is aimed at appraising the import of forensic psychology to the legal trials of mentally ill people. Method: Nigeria laws are replete with Criminal Codes and Criminal Procedure Acts but there are numerous failed cases of insanity defences in Nigeria. The research technique of content analysis of insanity defences in Nigeria shows that there is a missing link. Results: That broken link is the application of forensic psychology using a battery of standardized instruments, validated and culture free, handled by unbiased and incorruptible forensic experts. Conclusion: it was concluded that expert psychiatric testimony can play a significant role in the ultimate verdict, in insanity trials in Nigeria. This finding was explained with the classical positivist school by Lombroso. This author suggested that this broken link be fixed by the Courts deliberately involving forensic experts and their reports in passing judgments. Keywords: Nigeria; Defence; Insanity; Law Courts; Psychiatry\",\"PeriodicalId\":422969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nigerian Journal of Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"150 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nigerian Journal of Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/NJPSYC.V7I2.50115\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/NJPSYC.V7I2.50115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在尼日利亚法庭上,心理学原理和技术在审判患有精神疾病的罪犯时失败,这是一个巨大的争议。目的:探讨司法心理学在精神病患者司法审判中的重要作用。方法:尼日利亚法律充满了刑法和刑事诉讼法,但在尼日利亚有许多精神错乱辩护失败的案例。尼日利亚精神错乱抗辩内容分析的研究方法表明,精神错乱抗辩内容分析存在缺失环节。结果:这个断裂的环节是法医心理学的应用,使用一系列标准化的仪器,经过验证和文化自由,由公正和廉洁的法医专家处理。结论:结论是,在尼日利亚的精神错乱审判中,专家精神病学证词可以在最终判决中发挥重要作用。这一发现被隆布罗梭的古典实证主义学派所解释。这位作者建议,法院在作出判决时故意让法医专家和他们的报告参与,以修复这种断裂的联系。关键词:尼日利亚;国防;精神错乱;法院;精神病学
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of Defence of Insanity in Nigerian Courts: The Missing Link
Background: There is a huge controversy over failed applications of psychological principles and techniques to the trials of offenders who are mentally ill in Nigerian courts. Aim: This paper is aimed at appraising the import of forensic psychology to the legal trials of mentally ill people. Method: Nigeria laws are replete with Criminal Codes and Criminal Procedure Acts but there are numerous failed cases of insanity defences in Nigeria. The research technique of content analysis of insanity defences in Nigeria shows that there is a missing link. Results: That broken link is the application of forensic psychology using a battery of standardized instruments, validated and culture free, handled by unbiased and incorruptible forensic experts. Conclusion: it was concluded that expert psychiatric testimony can play a significant role in the ultimate verdict, in insanity trials in Nigeria. This finding was explained with the classical positivist school by Lombroso. This author suggested that this broken link be fixed by the Courts deliberately involving forensic experts and their reports in passing judgments. Keywords: Nigeria; Defence; Insanity; Law Courts; Psychiatry
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信