法律保护,不允许对社交媒体产品进行审查

I Wayan Pertama Yasa, Nia Styawati, Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti
{"title":"法律保护,不允许对社交媒体产品进行审查","authors":"I Wayan Pertama Yasa, Nia Styawati, Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti","doi":"10.22225/juinhum.3.1.4747.210-214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"  \nThe era of the digital economy in Indonesia has made buying and selling transactions easier and faster to do. By using social media, consumers can channel their opinions, criticisms and suggestions on the goods/services they consume to business actors in various forms. One of them is in the form of a review (review) of goods/services products that are poured through photos and videos. However, this activity reaped pros and cons in the community, because it is considered that this activity actually tarnishes the good name. This study aims to examine the form of legal protection against the provisions for reviewing products on social media. The sources of legal materials used in this paper are the first sources of primary legal materials that have binding power, the second sources of secondary legal materials which are legal materials derived from the results of literature studies by reading books, legal journals, and articles in accordance with the issue at hand. Data were analyzed by qualitative method. This study uses a normative type of research by using a deductive reasoning approach. Legal protection for the provisions for reviewing products on social media is stated in Law Number 12 of 2005 Article 23 paragraph (2) concerning Human Rights, Article 44 paragraph (3) of the UUPK, and criminal sanctions for perpetrators are stipulated in the UUPK which can be sentenced to punishment. imprisonment and fines.","PeriodicalId":197649,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Ketentuan Me-Review Produk dimedia Sosial\",\"authors\":\"I Wayan Pertama Yasa, Nia Styawati, Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti\",\"doi\":\"10.22225/juinhum.3.1.4747.210-214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"  \\nThe era of the digital economy in Indonesia has made buying and selling transactions easier and faster to do. By using social media, consumers can channel their opinions, criticisms and suggestions on the goods/services they consume to business actors in various forms. One of them is in the form of a review (review) of goods/services products that are poured through photos and videos. However, this activity reaped pros and cons in the community, because it is considered that this activity actually tarnishes the good name. This study aims to examine the form of legal protection against the provisions for reviewing products on social media. The sources of legal materials used in this paper are the first sources of primary legal materials that have binding power, the second sources of secondary legal materials which are legal materials derived from the results of literature studies by reading books, legal journals, and articles in accordance with the issue at hand. Data were analyzed by qualitative method. This study uses a normative type of research by using a deductive reasoning approach. Legal protection for the provisions for reviewing products on social media is stated in Law Number 12 of 2005 Article 23 paragraph (2) concerning Human Rights, Article 44 paragraph (3) of the UUPK, and criminal sanctions for perpetrators are stipulated in the UUPK which can be sentenced to punishment. imprisonment and fines.\",\"PeriodicalId\":197649,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22225/juinhum.3.1.4747.210-214\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22225/juinhum.3.1.4747.210-214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

印尼的数字经济时代让买卖交易变得更容易、更快捷。通过使用社交媒体,消费者可以将他们对所消费商品/服务的意见、批评和建议以各种形式传达给商业行为者。其中一种形式是通过照片和视频对商品/服务产品进行点评(点评)。然而,这个活动在社区中褒贬不一,因为人们认为这个活动实际上玷污了好名声。本研究旨在探讨针对社交媒体上审查产品规定的法律保护形式。本文所使用的法律资料来源是具有约束力的一级法律资料的第一来源,二级法律资料的第二来源是根据手头的问题,通过阅读书籍、法律期刊和文章等文献研究结果而获得的法律资料。资料采用定性分析方法。本研究采用了一种规范性的研究方式,采用了演绎推理的方法。2005年第12号法律对审查社交媒体上的产品的规定提供了法律保护,这是关于人权的第23条第(2)款和UUPK第44条第(3)款,UUPK规定了对犯罪者的刑事制裁,可以判处刑罚。监禁和罚款。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Ketentuan Me-Review Produk dimedia Sosial
  The era of the digital economy in Indonesia has made buying and selling transactions easier and faster to do. By using social media, consumers can channel their opinions, criticisms and suggestions on the goods/services they consume to business actors in various forms. One of them is in the form of a review (review) of goods/services products that are poured through photos and videos. However, this activity reaped pros and cons in the community, because it is considered that this activity actually tarnishes the good name. This study aims to examine the form of legal protection against the provisions for reviewing products on social media. The sources of legal materials used in this paper are the first sources of primary legal materials that have binding power, the second sources of secondary legal materials which are legal materials derived from the results of literature studies by reading books, legal journals, and articles in accordance with the issue at hand. Data were analyzed by qualitative method. This study uses a normative type of research by using a deductive reasoning approach. Legal protection for the provisions for reviewing products on social media is stated in Law Number 12 of 2005 Article 23 paragraph (2) concerning Human Rights, Article 44 paragraph (3) of the UUPK, and criminal sanctions for perpetrators are stipulated in the UUPK which can be sentenced to punishment. imprisonment and fines.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信