Mateusz Wojtanowski
{"title":"Odczarować zaklęciem? Uwagi na marginesie monografii Rafała Mańko o krytycznej filozofii orzekania","authors":"Mateusz Wojtanowski","doi":"10.36280/afpifs.2020.4.118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The reviewer claims that Rafał Mańko's monograph 'Towards a critical philosophy of adjudication. The political, ethics, legitimacy’ (Łódź, 2018) should be connected with the so called essentialist wing of postmodernism, which deals with the issues of traditional philosophy under the veil of cognitive skepticism. The review attempts to convince a reader that the author's authoritative metaphysical statements translate into too radical program in the field of adjudication. The reviewer do not deny the necessity to 'open' the traditional legal domain to external arguments, however, he claim that the proposal presented in this regard by Rafał Mańko is too far-reaching.","PeriodicalId":179034,"journal":{"name":"Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej","volume":"135 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36280/afpifs.2020.4.118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

审稿人声称,拉瓦科夫Mańko的专著《走向审判的批判哲学》。“政治、伦理、合法性”(Łódź, 2018)应该与后现代主义的所谓本质主义翼联系起来,后者在认知怀疑主义的面纱下处理传统哲学的问题。这篇评论试图让读者相信,作者权威的形而上学陈述在审判领域转化为过于激进的计划。审稿人并不否认有必要将传统的法律领域“开放”给外部论点,但是,他声称rafazov Mańko在这方面提出的建议影响太大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Odczarować zaklęciem? Uwagi na marginesie monografii Rafała Mańko o krytycznej filozofii orzekania
The reviewer claims that Rafał Mańko's monograph 'Towards a critical philosophy of adjudication. The political, ethics, legitimacy’ (Łódź, 2018) should be connected with the so called essentialist wing of postmodernism, which deals with the issues of traditional philosophy under the veil of cognitive skepticism. The review attempts to convince a reader that the author's authoritative metaphysical statements translate into too radical program in the field of adjudication. The reviewer do not deny the necessity to 'open' the traditional legal domain to external arguments, however, he claim that the proposal presented in this regard by Rafał Mańko is too far-reaching.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信