在以太坊中实现隐私保护智能合约的经验教训

A. Unterweger, F. Knirsch, Christoph Leixnering, D. Engel
{"title":"在以太坊中实现隐私保护智能合约的经验教训","authors":"A. Unterweger, F. Knirsch, Christoph Leixnering, D. Engel","doi":"10.1109/NTMS.2018.8328739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Real-world smart contracts which preserve the privacy of both, their users and their data, have barely been proposed theoretically, let alone been implemented practically. In this paper, we are the first to implement a privacy-preserving protocol from the energy domain as a smart contract in Ethereum. We elaborate on and present our implementation as well as our practical findings, including more or less subtle traps and pitfalls. Despite major optimizations to our implementation, we find that while it is currently possible, it is not feasible to implement a privacy-preserving protocol of modest complexity in the Ethereum blockchain due to the high cost of operation and the lack of privacy by design.","PeriodicalId":140704,"journal":{"name":"2018 9th IFIP International Conference on New Technologies, Mobility and Security (NTMS)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lessons Learned from Implementing a Privacy-Preserving Smart Contract in Ethereum\",\"authors\":\"A. Unterweger, F. Knirsch, Christoph Leixnering, D. Engel\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NTMS.2018.8328739\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Real-world smart contracts which preserve the privacy of both, their users and their data, have barely been proposed theoretically, let alone been implemented practically. In this paper, we are the first to implement a privacy-preserving protocol from the energy domain as a smart contract in Ethereum. We elaborate on and present our implementation as well as our practical findings, including more or less subtle traps and pitfalls. Despite major optimizations to our implementation, we find that while it is currently possible, it is not feasible to implement a privacy-preserving protocol of modest complexity in the Ethereum blockchain due to the high cost of operation and the lack of privacy by design.\",\"PeriodicalId\":140704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 9th IFIP International Conference on New Technologies, Mobility and Security (NTMS)\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 9th IFIP International Conference on New Technologies, Mobility and Security (NTMS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NTMS.2018.8328739\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 9th IFIP International Conference on New Technologies, Mobility and Security (NTMS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NTMS.2018.8328739","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

现实世界中保护用户和数据隐私的智能合约在理论上几乎没有被提出,更不用说在实践中实施了。在本文中,我们是第一个在以太坊中实现能源领域隐私保护协议作为智能合约的人。我们详细阐述并展示了我们的实现以及我们的实际发现,包括或多或少微妙的陷阱和陷阱。尽管对我们的实现进行了重大优化,但我们发现,虽然目前有可能,但由于操作成本高和设计缺乏隐私,在以太坊区块链中实现适度复杂的隐私保护协议是不可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lessons Learned from Implementing a Privacy-Preserving Smart Contract in Ethereum
Real-world smart contracts which preserve the privacy of both, their users and their data, have barely been proposed theoretically, let alone been implemented practically. In this paper, we are the first to implement a privacy-preserving protocol from the energy domain as a smart contract in Ethereum. We elaborate on and present our implementation as well as our practical findings, including more or less subtle traps and pitfalls. Despite major optimizations to our implementation, we find that while it is currently possible, it is not feasible to implement a privacy-preserving protocol of modest complexity in the Ethereum blockchain due to the high cost of operation and the lack of privacy by design.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信