Armen Ts. Marukyan
{"title":"ՀԱՅԿԱԿԱՆ ՀԱՐՑԸ ԼՈԶԱՆԻ ԽՈՐՀՐԴԱԺՈՂՈՎՈՒՄ 1923 թ. հուլիսի 24-ի Լոզանի պայմանագրի\n100-ամյակի առթիվ","authors":"Armen Ts. Marukyan","doi":"10.57192/18291864-2023.2-196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the process of signing the Lausanne Treaty, the mandatory conditions and\nprocedures for amending international treaties were not observed. Since neither the\nsubjects nor the parties of the two treaties are identical, there is no reason to argue\nthat the Treaty of Sèvres has been legally superseded by the Treaty of Lausanne.\nBased on this, it can be stated that the rights of the state parties to the Treaty of\nSevres that are not parties to the Treaty of Lausanne, from a legal point of view,\ncould not undergo any changes, in particular, the Treaty of Lausanne did not\nintroduce any changes into the provisions of the Treaty of Sèvres regarding the rights\nand interests of Armenia","PeriodicalId":436401,"journal":{"name":"Vem Pan-Armenian Journal","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vem Pan-Armenian Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57192/18291864-2023.2-196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在签署《洛桑条约》的过程中,没有遵守修改国际条约的强制性条件和程序。由于这两个条约的主体和当事国都不相同,因此没有理由认为《桑条约》在法律上已被《洛桑条约》所取代。基于此,可以说,从法律的角度来看,非《洛桑条约》缔约国的《塞夫勒斯条约》缔约国的权利不能有任何改变,特别是《洛桑条约》没有对《塞夫勒斯条约》关于亚美尼亚权利和利益的规定作出任何改变
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ՀԱՅԿԱԿԱՆ ՀԱՐՑԸ ԼՈԶԱՆԻ ԽՈՐՀՐԴԱԺՈՂՈՎՈՒՄ 1923 թ. հուլիսի 24-ի Լոզանի պայմանագրի 100-ամյակի առթիվ
In the process of signing the Lausanne Treaty, the mandatory conditions and procedures for amending international treaties were not observed. Since neither the subjects nor the parties of the two treaties are identical, there is no reason to argue that the Treaty of Sèvres has been legally superseded by the Treaty of Lausanne. Based on this, it can be stated that the rights of the state parties to the Treaty of Sevres that are not parties to the Treaty of Lausanne, from a legal point of view, could not undergo any changes, in particular, the Treaty of Lausanne did not introduce any changes into the provisions of the Treaty of Sèvres regarding the rights and interests of Armenia
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信