约瑟夫·爱德华多·阿瓜卢萨《遗忘通论》对遗忘的剖析

S. Adebayo
{"title":"约瑟夫·爱德华多·阿瓜卢萨《遗忘通论》对遗忘的剖析","authors":"S. Adebayo","doi":"10.1080/21674736.2021.2023420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract José Eduardo Agualusa is one of the few novelists who write with the intention of exploring the workings of memory in their novels. In A General Theory of Oblivion, he provides a nuanced portrayal of oblivion as a mnemonic phenomenon in post-war Angola. In this paper, I trace the different strands of the politics of oblivion brought to bear in the novel. I argue that– because of the calculated silencing and mechanisms of repression observable in post-war Angola – the novel rescues the memory of the civil war from fading into oblivion. I argue that while the novel establishes oblivion as a variant of forgetting, it also invites us to consider ways in which oblivion may not be forgetting per se. That is, while forgetting may be understood simply – or simplistically – as a failure to remember, oblivion is an active, and sometimes passive, indifference to memory. I conclude that with forgetting, the past seems out of sight but with oblivion, the past is present but overlooked. Oblivion, therefore, exists within the boundaries of what is known and unknown, what is revealed and concealed. In all, this paper explores how A General Theory of Oblivion creates an anatomy of oblivion in post-war Angola and how that expands our understanding of the politics of memory in general.","PeriodicalId":116895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the African Literature Association","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The anatomy of oblivion in José Eduardo Agualusa’s A General Theory of Oblivion\",\"authors\":\"S. Adebayo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21674736.2021.2023420\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract José Eduardo Agualusa is one of the few novelists who write with the intention of exploring the workings of memory in their novels. In A General Theory of Oblivion, he provides a nuanced portrayal of oblivion as a mnemonic phenomenon in post-war Angola. In this paper, I trace the different strands of the politics of oblivion brought to bear in the novel. I argue that– because of the calculated silencing and mechanisms of repression observable in post-war Angola – the novel rescues the memory of the civil war from fading into oblivion. I argue that while the novel establishes oblivion as a variant of forgetting, it also invites us to consider ways in which oblivion may not be forgetting per se. That is, while forgetting may be understood simply – or simplistically – as a failure to remember, oblivion is an active, and sometimes passive, indifference to memory. I conclude that with forgetting, the past seems out of sight but with oblivion, the past is present but overlooked. Oblivion, therefore, exists within the boundaries of what is known and unknown, what is revealed and concealed. In all, this paper explores how A General Theory of Oblivion creates an anatomy of oblivion in post-war Angola and how that expands our understanding of the politics of memory in general.\",\"PeriodicalId\":116895,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the African Literature Association\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the African Literature Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21674736.2021.2023420\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the African Literature Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21674736.2021.2023420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

何塞·爱德华多·阿瓜卢萨是为数不多的以探索记忆运作为写作目的的小说家之一。在《遗忘通论》一书中,他细致入微地描述了战后安哥拉的遗忘现象。在本文中,我追溯了小说中遗忘政治的不同脉络。我认为,由于在战后安哥拉观察到的蓄意压制和压制机制,这部小说拯救了内战的记忆,使其免于被遗忘。我认为,虽然小说将遗忘确立为遗忘的一种变体,但它也让我们思考遗忘本身可能不是遗忘的方式。也就是说,遗忘可以简单地理解为——或者简单地理解为——记不住,而遗忘则是一种主动的,有时是被动的,对记忆的冷漠。我的结论是,通过遗忘,过去似乎看不见了;通过遗忘,过去就在眼前,但被忽视了。因此,遗忘存在于已知与未知、揭示与隐藏的界限之内。总之,这篇论文探讨了《遗忘通论》是如何对战后安哥拉的遗忘进行剖析的,以及它是如何扩展我们对一般记忆政治的理解的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The anatomy of oblivion in José Eduardo Agualusa’s A General Theory of Oblivion
Abstract José Eduardo Agualusa is one of the few novelists who write with the intention of exploring the workings of memory in their novels. In A General Theory of Oblivion, he provides a nuanced portrayal of oblivion as a mnemonic phenomenon in post-war Angola. In this paper, I trace the different strands of the politics of oblivion brought to bear in the novel. I argue that– because of the calculated silencing and mechanisms of repression observable in post-war Angola – the novel rescues the memory of the civil war from fading into oblivion. I argue that while the novel establishes oblivion as a variant of forgetting, it also invites us to consider ways in which oblivion may not be forgetting per se. That is, while forgetting may be understood simply – or simplistically – as a failure to remember, oblivion is an active, and sometimes passive, indifference to memory. I conclude that with forgetting, the past seems out of sight but with oblivion, the past is present but overlooked. Oblivion, therefore, exists within the boundaries of what is known and unknown, what is revealed and concealed. In all, this paper explores how A General Theory of Oblivion creates an anatomy of oblivion in post-war Angola and how that expands our understanding of the politics of memory in general.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信