“奇怪而扭曲的爱”:通过合作框架研究顿巴斯的艺术实践

Victoria Donovan, Darya Tsymbalyuk
{"title":"“奇怪而扭曲的爱”:通过合作框架研究顿巴斯的艺术实践","authors":"Victoria Donovan, Darya Tsymbalyuk","doi":"10.1353/reg.2021.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:From the production portraits of the Soviet avant-garde artists of the 1920s to the bleak depictions of failing Donbas monotowns in the cinema of the perestroika era, the landscapes and communities of Donbas have been repeatedly depicted as exotic abstractions, to be wondered at, emulated, or feared by the rest of the nation. In our role as researchers of such practices, we might consider ourselves to stand outside of the frame, to be engaged in a process of objective deconstruction that exposes the mechanisms of power that inform the politics of representation. In this article, we take issue with this assumption, highlighting the researcher's complicity in perpetuating subject-object dichotomies, and thus inequalities of power, when we write about cultural representations. We scrutinize our roles in constructing new frames for understanding a region whose cultural representations we engage in our writing, and especially through our own practices of curating creative community engagement projects. Drawing on methods of reciprocal ethnography and collaborative writing, we espouse a more ethical, feminist approach to our topic, \"writing with\" rather than \"writing about\" the artists and practitioners whose curatorial work has informed contemporary ideas of Donbas. We engage in dialogue with our interlocutors to collectively deconstruct our creative work on Donbas identities and explore our shared reactions to this process. In this way, we reflect on the mechanisms of framing and exclusion that we—as researchers, curators, and art practitioners—inevitably engage in our work.","PeriodicalId":307724,"journal":{"name":"Region: Regional Studies of Russia, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Strange and Twisted Love\\\": Researching Art Practices in Donbas through Collaborative Frames\",\"authors\":\"Victoria Donovan, Darya Tsymbalyuk\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/reg.2021.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:From the production portraits of the Soviet avant-garde artists of the 1920s to the bleak depictions of failing Donbas monotowns in the cinema of the perestroika era, the landscapes and communities of Donbas have been repeatedly depicted as exotic abstractions, to be wondered at, emulated, or feared by the rest of the nation. In our role as researchers of such practices, we might consider ourselves to stand outside of the frame, to be engaged in a process of objective deconstruction that exposes the mechanisms of power that inform the politics of representation. In this article, we take issue with this assumption, highlighting the researcher's complicity in perpetuating subject-object dichotomies, and thus inequalities of power, when we write about cultural representations. We scrutinize our roles in constructing new frames for understanding a region whose cultural representations we engage in our writing, and especially through our own practices of curating creative community engagement projects. Drawing on methods of reciprocal ethnography and collaborative writing, we espouse a more ethical, feminist approach to our topic, \\\"writing with\\\" rather than \\\"writing about\\\" the artists and practitioners whose curatorial work has informed contemporary ideas of Donbas. We engage in dialogue with our interlocutors to collectively deconstruct our creative work on Donbas identities and explore our shared reactions to this process. In this way, we reflect on the mechanisms of framing and exclusion that we—as researchers, curators, and art practitioners—inevitably engage in our work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":307724,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Region: Regional Studies of Russia, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Region: Regional Studies of Russia, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/reg.2021.0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Region: Regional Studies of Russia, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/reg.2021.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:从20世纪20年代苏联先锋派艺术家的作品肖像到改革时期电影中对失败的顿巴斯单调城镇的凄凉描绘,顿巴斯的风景和社区一再被描绘成异国情调的抽象,让其他国家的人感到惊奇、模仿或恐惧。作为这些实践的研究者,我们可能会认为自己站在框架之外,参与到一个客观解构的过程中,这个过程暴露了代表政治的权力机制。在本文中,我们对这一假设提出质疑,强调当我们写文化表征时,研究人员在延续主客体二分法方面的共谋,从而导致权力不平等。我们仔细审视自己在构建新框架中的角色,以理解我们参与写作的地区的文化表征,特别是通过我们自己策划创意社区参与项目的实践。利用互惠民族志和合作写作的方法,我们支持一种更道德、更女权主义的方法来处理我们的主题,“与”而不是“写”那些策展工作为当代顿巴斯思想提供信息的艺术家和实践者。我们与对话者进行对话,共同解构我们关于顿巴斯身份的创造性工作,并探讨我们对这一过程的共同反应。通过这种方式,我们反思作为研究人员、策展人和艺术从业者不可避免地参与到我们工作中的框架和排斥机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"Strange and Twisted Love": Researching Art Practices in Donbas through Collaborative Frames
Abstract:From the production portraits of the Soviet avant-garde artists of the 1920s to the bleak depictions of failing Donbas monotowns in the cinema of the perestroika era, the landscapes and communities of Donbas have been repeatedly depicted as exotic abstractions, to be wondered at, emulated, or feared by the rest of the nation. In our role as researchers of such practices, we might consider ourselves to stand outside of the frame, to be engaged in a process of objective deconstruction that exposes the mechanisms of power that inform the politics of representation. In this article, we take issue with this assumption, highlighting the researcher's complicity in perpetuating subject-object dichotomies, and thus inequalities of power, when we write about cultural representations. We scrutinize our roles in constructing new frames for understanding a region whose cultural representations we engage in our writing, and especially through our own practices of curating creative community engagement projects. Drawing on methods of reciprocal ethnography and collaborative writing, we espouse a more ethical, feminist approach to our topic, "writing with" rather than "writing about" the artists and practitioners whose curatorial work has informed contemporary ideas of Donbas. We engage in dialogue with our interlocutors to collectively deconstruct our creative work on Donbas identities and explore our shared reactions to this process. In this way, we reflect on the mechanisms of framing and exclusion that we—as researchers, curators, and art practitioners—inevitably engage in our work.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信