印尼对腐败罪犯的执法罪行

GP. Aditya Prawira Negara
{"title":"印尼对腐败罪犯的执法罪行","authors":"GP. Aditya Prawira Negara","doi":"10.37303/magister.v10i1.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Law enforcement in Indonesia in the case of Corruption Crimes outlined in Transparency International (IT) data Indonesia is still considered the most corrupt. Such conditions require the handling of criminal acts that are \"extraordinary\" (extra-ordinary enforcement) including law enforcement against corporate actors. Currently, the enforcement of tipikor law against corporate actors is not only focused on the person / manager but also focused on the corporation. In the Tipikor Law, the law enforcement of corporate actors uses 3 doctrines namely identification theory, vicarious liablity and strict liability and the model of criminal liability using administrators can be accounted for criminal together with corporations. Related to the procedures of law enforcement tipikor conducted by the corporation based on the knowledge and experience of each law enforcement officer and to overcome the problem MA issued Perma Number 13 of 2016 on Procedures for Handling Criminal Acts by Corporations. This is done to fill the legal void related to the handling of criminal acts with corporate actors who have not been clearly and firmly regulated. Enforcement of tipikor law by corporations experiencing several obstacles, among others, the main criminal sanctions are only in the form of fines {article 20 paragraph (7) of the Tipikor Law, which if the perpetrator does not want to pay there is no other alternative. The death penalty in article 2 paragraph (2) of the Tipikor Law cannot be applied to corporations. In addition, Perma Number 13 of 2016 cannot be used as a reference by investigators or public prosecutors because the Perma is binding into including criminal sanctions are still in the form of fines, have not regulated the mechanism of withdrawal of corporate criminal liability. \nKeywords : Law Enforcement, Criminal Acts, Corruption, Corporations","PeriodicalId":441760,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Magister Hukum Perspektif","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PENEGAKAN HUKUM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DI INDONESIA TERHADAP PELAKU KORPORASI\",\"authors\":\"GP. Aditya Prawira Negara\",\"doi\":\"10.37303/magister.v10i1.26\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Law enforcement in Indonesia in the case of Corruption Crimes outlined in Transparency International (IT) data Indonesia is still considered the most corrupt. Such conditions require the handling of criminal acts that are \\\"extraordinary\\\" (extra-ordinary enforcement) including law enforcement against corporate actors. Currently, the enforcement of tipikor law against corporate actors is not only focused on the person / manager but also focused on the corporation. In the Tipikor Law, the law enforcement of corporate actors uses 3 doctrines namely identification theory, vicarious liablity and strict liability and the model of criminal liability using administrators can be accounted for criminal together with corporations. Related to the procedures of law enforcement tipikor conducted by the corporation based on the knowledge and experience of each law enforcement officer and to overcome the problem MA issued Perma Number 13 of 2016 on Procedures for Handling Criminal Acts by Corporations. This is done to fill the legal void related to the handling of criminal acts with corporate actors who have not been clearly and firmly regulated. Enforcement of tipikor law by corporations experiencing several obstacles, among others, the main criminal sanctions are only in the form of fines {article 20 paragraph (7) of the Tipikor Law, which if the perpetrator does not want to pay there is no other alternative. The death penalty in article 2 paragraph (2) of the Tipikor Law cannot be applied to corporations. In addition, Perma Number 13 of 2016 cannot be used as a reference by investigators or public prosecutors because the Perma is binding into including criminal sanctions are still in the form of fines, have not regulated the mechanism of withdrawal of corporate criminal liability. \\nKeywords : Law Enforcement, Criminal Acts, Corruption, Corporations\",\"PeriodicalId\":441760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Magister Hukum Perspektif\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Magister Hukum Perspektif\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37303/magister.v10i1.26\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Magister Hukum Perspektif","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37303/magister.v10i1.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

国际透明组织(Transparency International)的数据显示,印尼在腐败犯罪方面的执法情况,印尼仍被认为是最腐败的国家。这种情况要求处理“非常”(特别执法)的犯罪行为,包括对企业行为者的执法。目前,针对公司行为者的tipikor法的执行不仅集中在个人/经理身上,而且集中在公司身上。在Tipikor法中,公司行为者的执法采用了识别理论、替代责任理论和严格责任理论三种理论,并采用了行政管理人员与公司共同承担刑事责任的模式。与公司根据每个执法人员的知识和经验进行的执法程序有关,为了克服问题,MA发布了2016年第13号关于公司处理犯罪行为的程序。这样做是为了填补与处理犯罪行为有关的法律空白,因为企业行为者没有得到明确和坚定的监管。公司在执行蒂皮寇法时遇到若干障碍,除其他外,主要的刑事制裁只是罚款的形式{《蒂皮寇法》第20条第7款,如果犯罪者不愿付款,就没有其他办法。《提皮寇法》第2条第2款规定的死刑不适用于公司。此外,2016年第13号Perma不能作为调查人员或检察官的参考,因为Perma具有约束力,包括刑事制裁仍以罚款的形式存在,没有规定企业刑事责任的回避机制。关键词:执法,犯罪行为,腐败,公司
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PENEGAKAN HUKUM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DI INDONESIA TERHADAP PELAKU KORPORASI
Law enforcement in Indonesia in the case of Corruption Crimes outlined in Transparency International (IT) data Indonesia is still considered the most corrupt. Such conditions require the handling of criminal acts that are "extraordinary" (extra-ordinary enforcement) including law enforcement against corporate actors. Currently, the enforcement of tipikor law against corporate actors is not only focused on the person / manager but also focused on the corporation. In the Tipikor Law, the law enforcement of corporate actors uses 3 doctrines namely identification theory, vicarious liablity and strict liability and the model of criminal liability using administrators can be accounted for criminal together with corporations. Related to the procedures of law enforcement tipikor conducted by the corporation based on the knowledge and experience of each law enforcement officer and to overcome the problem MA issued Perma Number 13 of 2016 on Procedures for Handling Criminal Acts by Corporations. This is done to fill the legal void related to the handling of criminal acts with corporate actors who have not been clearly and firmly regulated. Enforcement of tipikor law by corporations experiencing several obstacles, among others, the main criminal sanctions are only in the form of fines {article 20 paragraph (7) of the Tipikor Law, which if the perpetrator does not want to pay there is no other alternative. The death penalty in article 2 paragraph (2) of the Tipikor Law cannot be applied to corporations. In addition, Perma Number 13 of 2016 cannot be used as a reference by investigators or public prosecutors because the Perma is binding into including criminal sanctions are still in the form of fines, have not regulated the mechanism of withdrawal of corporate criminal liability. Keywords : Law Enforcement, Criminal Acts, Corruption, Corporations
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信