约翰·布劳斯的《恢复加拿大:本土法的复兴》中的“重新覆盖承认的界限:差异政治与去殖民化”

Brenna Bhandar
{"title":"约翰·布劳斯的《恢复加拿大:本土法的复兴》中的“重新覆盖承认的界限:差异政治与去殖民化”","authors":"Brenna Bhandar","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.813884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author examines John Borrows' innovative and complex critique of the origins of the settler colonial state and its law, contemporary Aboriginal rights jurisprudence, and government policies that have left Aboriginal communities dispossessed and marginalized. She critically reviews his proposals for the creation of a sui generis legal order in light of political theories of recognition; which, through employing liberal concepts of 'identity and difference,' rely upon essentialist notions of cultural difference. The author suggests that the theory of recognition as it is currently configured does not do justice to Borrows' notion of a sui generis legal order, which provides a blueprint for a movement to a more (genuinely) post-colonial legal and political culture than currently exists in Canada.","PeriodicalId":381446,"journal":{"name":"The Australian Feminist Law Journal","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-Covering the Limits of Recognition: The Politics of Difference and Decolonisation in John Borrows' Recovering Canada: The Resurgence of Indigenous Law\",\"authors\":\"Brenna Bhandar\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.813884\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The author examines John Borrows' innovative and complex critique of the origins of the settler colonial state and its law, contemporary Aboriginal rights jurisprudence, and government policies that have left Aboriginal communities dispossessed and marginalized. She critically reviews his proposals for the creation of a sui generis legal order in light of political theories of recognition; which, through employing liberal concepts of 'identity and difference,' rely upon essentialist notions of cultural difference. The author suggests that the theory of recognition as it is currently configured does not do justice to Borrows' notion of a sui generis legal order, which provides a blueprint for a movement to a more (genuinely) post-colonial legal and political culture than currently exists in Canada.\",\"PeriodicalId\":381446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Australian Feminist Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Australian Feminist Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.813884\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Australian Feminist Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.813884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

作者考察了约翰·博罗斯对移民殖民国家及其法律的起源、当代土著权利法学以及导致土著社区被剥夺和边缘化的政府政策的创新和复杂的批评。她批判性地回顾了他在政治承认理论的基础上提出的建立一种独特的法律秩序的建议;通过运用自由主义的“认同与差异”概念,它依赖于文化差异的本质主义概念。作者认为,目前被配置的承认理论并没有公正地对待博罗尔斯关于一种独特的法律秩序的概念,这种法律秩序为一种比目前在加拿大存在的更(真正的)后殖民法律和政治文化的运动提供了蓝图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Re-Covering the Limits of Recognition: The Politics of Difference and Decolonisation in John Borrows' Recovering Canada: The Resurgence of Indigenous Law
The author examines John Borrows' innovative and complex critique of the origins of the settler colonial state and its law, contemporary Aboriginal rights jurisprudence, and government policies that have left Aboriginal communities dispossessed and marginalized. She critically reviews his proposals for the creation of a sui generis legal order in light of political theories of recognition; which, through employing liberal concepts of 'identity and difference,' rely upon essentialist notions of cultural difference. The author suggests that the theory of recognition as it is currently configured does not do justice to Borrows' notion of a sui generis legal order, which provides a blueprint for a movement to a more (genuinely) post-colonial legal and political culture than currently exists in Canada.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信