交通标志识别分类方法的比较研究

Wahyono, K. Jo
{"title":"交通标志识别分类方法的比较研究","authors":"Wahyono, K. Jo","doi":"10.1109/ICIT.2014.6895001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a comparative study of several classification methods for the task of recognizing traffic signs in urban areas. These classification methods are artificial neural network (ANN), k-nearest neighbors (kNN), support vector machine (SVM), and random forest (RF). First, HSI-based color segmentation process is applied to obtain candidate regions. Using centroid-based feature, these regions will be classified into three shape classes, such as circle, rectangle and triangle. Hereafter, histograms of oriented gradient (HOG) features are extracted from each region that will be utilized in recognizing step. For comparison, well-known public databases will be used. The comparison based on the implementation result from those data with difference condition of intensity and angle of view. Comprehensive comparative results to illustrate the performance result of each classification method are presented.","PeriodicalId":240337,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study of classification methods for traffic signs recognition\",\"authors\":\"Wahyono, K. Jo\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICIT.2014.6895001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents a comparative study of several classification methods for the task of recognizing traffic signs in urban areas. These classification methods are artificial neural network (ANN), k-nearest neighbors (kNN), support vector machine (SVM), and random forest (RF). First, HSI-based color segmentation process is applied to obtain candidate regions. Using centroid-based feature, these regions will be classified into three shape classes, such as circle, rectangle and triangle. Hereafter, histograms of oriented gradient (HOG) features are extracted from each region that will be utilized in recognizing step. For comparison, well-known public databases will be used. The comparison based on the implementation result from those data with difference condition of intensity and angle of view. Comprehensive comparative results to illustrate the performance result of each classification method are presented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":240337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT)\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIT.2014.6895001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIT.2014.6895001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

本文对城市交通标志识别的几种分类方法进行了比较研究。这些分类方法包括人工神经网络(ANN)、k近邻(kNN)、支持向量机(SVM)和随机森林(RF)。首先,采用基于hsi的颜色分割方法获得候选区域;利用基于质心的特征,将这些区域划分为圆形、矩形和三角形三种形状类别。然后,从每个区域提取定向梯度直方图(HOG)特征,用于识别步骤。为了进行比较,将使用知名的公共数据库。在强度和视角条件不同的情况下,对这些数据的实现结果进行了比较。给出了综合比较结果,以说明每种分类方法的性能结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative study of classification methods for traffic signs recognition
This paper presents a comparative study of several classification methods for the task of recognizing traffic signs in urban areas. These classification methods are artificial neural network (ANN), k-nearest neighbors (kNN), support vector machine (SVM), and random forest (RF). First, HSI-based color segmentation process is applied to obtain candidate regions. Using centroid-based feature, these regions will be classified into three shape classes, such as circle, rectangle and triangle. Hereafter, histograms of oriented gradient (HOG) features are extracted from each region that will be utilized in recognizing step. For comparison, well-known public databases will be used. The comparison based on the implementation result from those data with difference condition of intensity and angle of view. Comprehensive comparative results to illustrate the performance result of each classification method are presented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信