{"title":"柏拉图的健全语言与对语言的伤害","authors":"Magali Année","doi":"10.22618/tp.pjcv.20215.2.114001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“To speak in a harmful way (τὸ μὴ καλῶς λέγειν) is not only a false note towards language itself (εἰς αὐτὸ τοῦτο πλημμελές), it is also to infuse some evil within souls.” This worrisome statement in the Phaedo (115 e 5–7) should be considered as a key of Plato’s dialogues. But how shall we understand the harmfulness of a “false note” inside the very language thought of as having its own autonomy? Does it have to do with “stasis between names” (Cratylus 438 d 2), and if so, where to find, inside language, the “right note” capable of preventing the disaster of souls?","PeriodicalId":220201,"journal":{"name":"The Philosophical Journal of Conflict and Violence","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Plato’s Sound Language against the Harm done to Language\",\"authors\":\"Magali Année\",\"doi\":\"10.22618/tp.pjcv.20215.2.114001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"“To speak in a harmful way (τὸ μὴ καλῶς λέγειν) is not only a false note towards language itself (εἰς αὐτὸ τοῦτο πλημμελές), it is also to infuse some evil within souls.” This worrisome statement in the Phaedo (115 e 5–7) should be considered as a key of Plato’s dialogues. But how shall we understand the harmfulness of a “false note” inside the very language thought of as having its own autonomy? Does it have to do with “stasis between names” (Cratylus 438 d 2), and if so, where to find, inside language, the “right note” capable of preventing the disaster of souls?\",\"PeriodicalId\":220201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Philosophical Journal of Conflict and Violence\",\"volume\":\"81 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Philosophical Journal of Conflict and Violence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22618/tp.pjcv.20215.2.114001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Philosophical Journal of Conflict and Violence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22618/tp.pjcv.20215.2.114001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
“用一种有害的方式说话(τ - μ - καλ λ ς λ)不仅是对语言本身的一种错误的注意(ε - ς α - τ - τ το το πλημμε)，也是在灵魂中注入一些邪恶。”《斐多篇》(115 e 5-7)中这段令人担忧的陈述应该被视为柏拉图对话录的关键。但是，我们该如何理解一种被认为具有自身自主性的语言内部的“假音符”的危害呢?它是否与“名字之间的停滞”(克拉提罗斯438 d 2)有关，如果是这样，在语言内部，哪里可以找到能够防止灵魂灾难的“正确音符”?
Plato’s Sound Language against the Harm done to Language
“To speak in a harmful way (τὸ μὴ καλῶς λέγειν) is not only a false note towards language itself (εἰς αὐτὸ τοῦτο πλημμελές), it is also to infuse some evil within souls.” This worrisome statement in the Phaedo (115 e 5–7) should be considered as a key of Plato’s dialogues. But how shall we understand the harmfulness of a “false note” inside the very language thought of as having its own autonomy? Does it have to do with “stasis between names” (Cratylus 438 d 2), and if so, where to find, inside language, the “right note” capable of preventing the disaster of souls?
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
