ConfAssist:协助计算机科学会议分类的冲突解决框架

Mayank Singh, Tanmoy Chakraborty, Animesh Mukherjee, Pawan Goyal
{"title":"ConfAssist:协助计算机科学会议分类的冲突解决框架","authors":"Mayank Singh, Tanmoy Chakraborty, Animesh Mukherjee, Pawan Goyal","doi":"10.1145/2756406.2756963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Classifying publication venues into top-tier or non top-tier is quite subjective and can be debatable at times. sIn this paper, we propose ConfAssist, a novel assisting framework for conference categorization that aims to address the limitations in the existing systems and portals for venue classification. We identify various features related to the stability of conferences that might help us separate a top-tier conference from the rest of the lot. While there are many clear cases where expert agreement can be almost immediately achieved as to whether a conference is a top-tier or not, there are equally many cases that can result in a conflict even among the experts. ConfAssist tries to serve as an aid in such cases by increasing the confidence of the experts in their decision. A human judgment survey was conducted with 28 domain experts. The results were quite impressive with 91.6% classification accuracy.","PeriodicalId":256118,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 15th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ConfAssist: A Conflict Resolution Framework for Assisting the Categorization of Computer Science Conferences\",\"authors\":\"Mayank Singh, Tanmoy Chakraborty, Animesh Mukherjee, Pawan Goyal\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2756406.2756963\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Classifying publication venues into top-tier or non top-tier is quite subjective and can be debatable at times. sIn this paper, we propose ConfAssist, a novel assisting framework for conference categorization that aims to address the limitations in the existing systems and portals for venue classification. We identify various features related to the stability of conferences that might help us separate a top-tier conference from the rest of the lot. While there are many clear cases where expert agreement can be almost immediately achieved as to whether a conference is a top-tier or not, there are equally many cases that can result in a conflict even among the experts. ConfAssist tries to serve as an aid in such cases by increasing the confidence of the experts in their decision. A human judgment survey was conducted with 28 domain experts. The results were quite impressive with 91.6% classification accuracy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":256118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 15th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 15th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2756406.2756963\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 15th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2756406.2756963","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

将出版场所划分为顶级或非顶级是非常主观的,有时可能会引起争议。在本文中,我们提出了一个新的会议分类辅助框架ConfAssist,旨在解决现有系统和场所分类门户的局限性。我们确定了与会议稳定性相关的各种特征,这些特征可能有助于我们将顶级会议与其他会议区分开来。虽然在许多情况下,专家几乎可以立即就会议是否属于顶级会议达成一致意见,但在同样多的情况下,甚至在专家之间也可能导致冲突。ConfAssist试图在这种情况下通过增加专家对其决定的信心来提供帮助。对28位领域专家进行了人的判断调查。结果令人印象深刻,分类准确率为91.6%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ConfAssist: A Conflict Resolution Framework for Assisting the Categorization of Computer Science Conferences
Classifying publication venues into top-tier or non top-tier is quite subjective and can be debatable at times. sIn this paper, we propose ConfAssist, a novel assisting framework for conference categorization that aims to address the limitations in the existing systems and portals for venue classification. We identify various features related to the stability of conferences that might help us separate a top-tier conference from the rest of the lot. While there are many clear cases where expert agreement can be almost immediately achieved as to whether a conference is a top-tier or not, there are equally many cases that can result in a conflict even among the experts. ConfAssist tries to serve as an aid in such cases by increasing the confidence of the experts in their decision. A human judgment survey was conducted with 28 domain experts. The results were quite impressive with 91.6% classification accuracy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信