组织悖论学术的对话与启示

R. Bednarek, Marianne W. Lewis, J. Schad
{"title":"组织悖论学术的对话与启示","authors":"R. Bednarek, Marianne W. Lewis, J. Schad","doi":"10.1108/S0733-558X2021000073B014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Early paradox research in organization theory contained a remarkable breadth of inspirations from outside disciplines. We wanted to know more about where early scholarship found inspiration to create what has since become paradox theory. To shed light on this, we engaged seminal paradox scholars in conversations: asking about their past experiences drawing from outside disciplines and their views on the future of paradox theory. These conversations surfaced several themes of past and future inspirations: (1) understanding complex phenomena; (2) drawing from related disciplines; (3) combining interdisciplinary insights; and (4) bridging discourses in organization theory. We end the piece with suggestions for future paradox research inspired by these conversations.","PeriodicalId":185924,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Dialogues on Organizational Paradox: Investigating Social Structures and Human Expression, Part B","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conversations and Inspirations for Organizational Paradox Scholarship\",\"authors\":\"R. Bednarek, Marianne W. Lewis, J. Schad\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/S0733-558X2021000073B014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Early paradox research in organization theory contained a remarkable breadth of inspirations from outside disciplines. We wanted to know more about where early scholarship found inspiration to create what has since become paradox theory. To shed light on this, we engaged seminal paradox scholars in conversations: asking about their past experiences drawing from outside disciplines and their views on the future of paradox theory. These conversations surfaced several themes of past and future inspirations: (1) understanding complex phenomena; (2) drawing from related disciplines; (3) combining interdisciplinary insights; and (4) bridging discourses in organization theory. We end the piece with suggestions for future paradox research inspired by these conversations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":185924,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interdisciplinary Dialogues on Organizational Paradox: Investigating Social Structures and Human Expression, Part B\",\"volume\":\"82 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interdisciplinary Dialogues on Organizational Paradox: Investigating Social Structures and Human Expression, Part B\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X2021000073B014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Dialogues on Organizational Paradox: Investigating Social Structures and Human Expression, Part B","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X2021000073B014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

早期组织理论的悖论研究包含了来自外部学科的显著广度的灵感。我们想更多地了解早期学者从哪里获得灵感,创造出后来成为悖论理论的理论。为了阐明这一点,我们与具有开创性的悖论学者进行了对话:询问他们过去从外部学科吸取的经验,以及他们对悖论理论未来的看法。这些对话揭示了几个过去和未来的启示主题:(1)理解复杂现象;(二)借鉴相关学科;(3)结合跨学科的见解;(4)组织理论中的衔接语篇。在文章的最后,我们提出了受这些对话启发的对未来悖论研究的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conversations and Inspirations for Organizational Paradox Scholarship
Early paradox research in organization theory contained a remarkable breadth of inspirations from outside disciplines. We wanted to know more about where early scholarship found inspiration to create what has since become paradox theory. To shed light on this, we engaged seminal paradox scholars in conversations: asking about their past experiences drawing from outside disciplines and their views on the future of paradox theory. These conversations surfaced several themes of past and future inspirations: (1) understanding complex phenomena; (2) drawing from related disciplines; (3) combining interdisciplinary insights; and (4) bridging discourses in organization theory. We end the piece with suggestions for future paradox research inspired by these conversations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信