邻接权:寻找教条式的基础。新闻出版商的案例

Valentina Moscon
{"title":"邻接权:寻找教条式的基础。新闻出版商的案例","authors":"Valentina Moscon","doi":"10.4337/9781788119900.00010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The European Commission proposal for new neighbouring rights for press publishers comes in the wake of a general trend of creating new “neighbouring rights”, as is the case, for instance, with sports events. Increasing recourse to neighbouring rights for the protection of different subject matter reveals that the underlying basic concepts are rather vague, calling for careful reflection on the legal nature of such rights and their relation to copyright. \r\n\r\nThis paper proposes to analyse whether protection of press publishers’ investment in producing and circulating news may be a task for intellectual property and precisely for neighbouring rights. After having highlighted the lack of a rationale for introducing press publishing neighbouring rights, tangential territories of law (i.e. copyright law, sui generis database protection, competition law and trademark law) will be identified as relevant in this field.","PeriodicalId":136279,"journal":{"name":"Online Distribution of Content in the EU","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neighbouring rights: in search of a dogmatic foundation. The press publishers’ case\",\"authors\":\"Valentina Moscon\",\"doi\":\"10.4337/9781788119900.00010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The European Commission proposal for new neighbouring rights for press publishers comes in the wake of a general trend of creating new “neighbouring rights”, as is the case, for instance, with sports events. Increasing recourse to neighbouring rights for the protection of different subject matter reveals that the underlying basic concepts are rather vague, calling for careful reflection on the legal nature of such rights and their relation to copyright. \\r\\n\\r\\nThis paper proposes to analyse whether protection of press publishers’ investment in producing and circulating news may be a task for intellectual property and precisely for neighbouring rights. After having highlighted the lack of a rationale for introducing press publishing neighbouring rights, tangential territories of law (i.e. copyright law, sui generis database protection, competition law and trademark law) will be identified as relevant in this field.\",\"PeriodicalId\":136279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Online Distribution of Content in the EU\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Online Distribution of Content in the EU\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788119900.00010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Distribution of Content in the EU","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788119900.00010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧盟委员会(European Commission)提议为新闻出版商提供新的邻接权,是在创造新的“邻接权”的大趋势之后提出的,比如体育赛事。越来越多地诉诸邻接权来保护不同的主题,这表明其基本概念相当模糊,需要仔细思考这些权利的法律性质及其与版权的关系。本文拟分析新闻出版者在新闻生产和流通中的投资保护是否可能是知识产权的任务,而恰恰是邻接权的任务。在强调了缺乏引入新闻出版邻接权的理由之后,将确定与这一领域相关的法律领域(即版权法、特殊数据库保护、竞争法和商标法)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neighbouring rights: in search of a dogmatic foundation. The press publishers’ case
The European Commission proposal for new neighbouring rights for press publishers comes in the wake of a general trend of creating new “neighbouring rights”, as is the case, for instance, with sports events. Increasing recourse to neighbouring rights for the protection of different subject matter reveals that the underlying basic concepts are rather vague, calling for careful reflection on the legal nature of such rights and their relation to copyright. This paper proposes to analyse whether protection of press publishers’ investment in producing and circulating news may be a task for intellectual property and precisely for neighbouring rights. After having highlighted the lack of a rationale for introducing press publishing neighbouring rights, tangential territories of law (i.e. copyright law, sui generis database protection, competition law and trademark law) will be identified as relevant in this field.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信