基于信仰的道德投资:以道琼斯伊斯兰指数为例

M. Hassan, E. Girard
{"title":"基于信仰的道德投资:以道琼斯伊斯兰指数为例","authors":"M. Hassan, E. Girard","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1808853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the performance of seven indexes chosen from the Dow Jones Islamic Market Index (DJIM) vis-a-vis their non-Islamic counterparts using a variety of measures such as Sharpe, Treynor, Jensen and Fama’s selectivity, net selectivity and diversification. Second, we examine the persistence of performance using Carhart’s (1997) four factor pricing models. Third, we use cointegration to examine how the Islamic indexes compare to their non-Islamic counterparts. The sample period is from January 1996 to December 2005 (120 data points). It is further broken down into two sub-periods: January 1996 to December 2000 (60 data points) and January 2001 to December 2006 (60 data points). We find no difference between Islamic and non-Islamic indexes. The Dow Jones Islamic indexes outperform their conventional counterparts from 1996 to 2000 and underperform them from 2001 to 2005. Overall, similar reward to risk and diversification benefits exist for both the Islamic and conventional indexes.","PeriodicalId":373040,"journal":{"name":"Islamic Economic Studies (IES)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"169","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Faith-Based Ethical Investing: The Case of Dow Jones Islamic Indexes\",\"authors\":\"M. Hassan, E. Girard\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1808853\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines the performance of seven indexes chosen from the Dow Jones Islamic Market Index (DJIM) vis-a-vis their non-Islamic counterparts using a variety of measures such as Sharpe, Treynor, Jensen and Fama’s selectivity, net selectivity and diversification. Second, we examine the persistence of performance using Carhart’s (1997) four factor pricing models. Third, we use cointegration to examine how the Islamic indexes compare to their non-Islamic counterparts. The sample period is from January 1996 to December 2005 (120 data points). It is further broken down into two sub-periods: January 1996 to December 2000 (60 data points) and January 2001 to December 2006 (60 data points). We find no difference between Islamic and non-Islamic indexes. The Dow Jones Islamic indexes outperform their conventional counterparts from 1996 to 2000 and underperform them from 2001 to 2005. Overall, similar reward to risk and diversification benefits exist for both the Islamic and conventional indexes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":373040,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Islamic Economic Studies (IES)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"169\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Islamic Economic Studies (IES)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1808853\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Islamic Economic Studies (IES)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1808853","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 169

摘要

本文采用夏普、特雷诺、詹森和法玛的选择性、净选择性和多样化等多种衡量标准,考察了从道琼斯伊斯兰市场指数(DJIM)中选出的七个指数相对于非伊斯兰市场指数的表现。其次,我们使用Carhart(1997)的四因素定价模型来检验绩效的持久性。第三,我们使用协整来检验伊斯兰教指数与非伊斯兰教指数的比较。样本周期为1996年1月至2005年12月(120个数据点)。它进一步细分为两个子时期:1996年1月至2000年12月(60个数据点)和2001年1月至2006年12月(60个数据点)。我们发现伊斯兰教和非伊斯兰教的指数没有区别。1996年至2000年期间,道琼斯伊斯兰指数的表现优于传统指数,而2001年至2005年期间则不及传统指数。总体而言,伊斯兰指数和传统指数都存在类似的风险回报和多样化收益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Faith-Based Ethical Investing: The Case of Dow Jones Islamic Indexes
This paper examines the performance of seven indexes chosen from the Dow Jones Islamic Market Index (DJIM) vis-a-vis their non-Islamic counterparts using a variety of measures such as Sharpe, Treynor, Jensen and Fama’s selectivity, net selectivity and diversification. Second, we examine the persistence of performance using Carhart’s (1997) four factor pricing models. Third, we use cointegration to examine how the Islamic indexes compare to their non-Islamic counterparts. The sample period is from January 1996 to December 2005 (120 data points). It is further broken down into two sub-periods: January 1996 to December 2000 (60 data points) and January 2001 to December 2006 (60 data points). We find no difference between Islamic and non-Islamic indexes. The Dow Jones Islamic indexes outperform their conventional counterparts from 1996 to 2000 and underperform them from 2001 to 2005. Overall, similar reward to risk and diversification benefits exist for both the Islamic and conventional indexes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信