在西非禁止和控制母乳喂养之间:妇女预防艾滋病毒传播的策略

A. Desclaux, C. Alfieri
{"title":"在西非禁止和控制母乳喂养之间:妇女预防艾滋病毒传播的策略","authors":"A. Desclaux, C. Alfieri","doi":"10.4324/9781003085294-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With epidemiological evidence indicating that breastfeeding transmits HIV to more than one-­‐third of infants of HIV-­‐positive mothers in Africa, WHO recommendations have advised that women make a choice between preventive options, i.e. early weaning after exclusive breastfeeding, or formula feeding as in developed countries. Based on field data collected in Burkina Faso and Senegal, this paper will examine how the notions of choice/incapacity have been interpretated by women. Case studies will be presented about women's experiences and the feeding patterns they applied that show how the social and medical context shape decisions and practices. These results reveal how some women build lay preventive strategies, unexpected by health professionals that permit them to face dilemma when neither breastfeeding nor \" safe \" formula feeding is possible. Introduction When the first data about cases of HIV transmission through breastfeeding were published in 1985 (Ziegler, 1985 ; OMS/WHO, 1987; Dunn, 1992), the eviction of breastfeeding was rapidly adopted as a medical recommendation for women living with HIV in developed countries. They were summoned to formula feed their infants, and formula would be provided to them through social insurance systems or social programs. The number of infants born from HIV-­‐positive women was known as limited and formula feeding appeared as an easy strategy, already available, known to be acceptable, quite efficient since it would fully eliminate the risk of HIV transmission. In developing countries, the history of prevention of HIV transmission through breastfeeding was more complex. There, a number of factors hindered the scaling-­‐up of the eviction of breastfeeding as a preventive strategy regarding HIV risk. The main ones were the risks related to formula feeding in settings where the sanitation level is low and drinking or potable water is scarce, where access to fuel or electricity for heating and refrigerating formula based milk is not general, where literacy rates amongst women are limited, and where the epidemiological environment makes diarrhea common and malnutrition a leading cause of infant mortality. Also, a number of scientists under-­‐estimated the impact of the AIDS epidemic at a time when it had not reached its peak in all African sub-­‐regions, and doubted about the necessity to set up specific policies (Jelliffe and Jelliffe, 1988 :142).","PeriodicalId":408766,"journal":{"name":"Ethnographies of Breastfeeding","volume":"142 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Between Proscription and Control of Breastfeeding in West Africa: Women’s Strategies Regarding Prevention of HIV Transmission\",\"authors\":\"A. Desclaux, C. Alfieri\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781003085294-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With epidemiological evidence indicating that breastfeeding transmits HIV to more than one-­‐third of infants of HIV-­‐positive mothers in Africa, WHO recommendations have advised that women make a choice between preventive options, i.e. early weaning after exclusive breastfeeding, or formula feeding as in developed countries. Based on field data collected in Burkina Faso and Senegal, this paper will examine how the notions of choice/incapacity have been interpretated by women. Case studies will be presented about women's experiences and the feeding patterns they applied that show how the social and medical context shape decisions and practices. These results reveal how some women build lay preventive strategies, unexpected by health professionals that permit them to face dilemma when neither breastfeeding nor \\\" safe \\\" formula feeding is possible. Introduction When the first data about cases of HIV transmission through breastfeeding were published in 1985 (Ziegler, 1985 ; OMS/WHO, 1987; Dunn, 1992), the eviction of breastfeeding was rapidly adopted as a medical recommendation for women living with HIV in developed countries. They were summoned to formula feed their infants, and formula would be provided to them through social insurance systems or social programs. The number of infants born from HIV-­‐positive women was known as limited and formula feeding appeared as an easy strategy, already available, known to be acceptable, quite efficient since it would fully eliminate the risk of HIV transmission. In developing countries, the history of prevention of HIV transmission through breastfeeding was more complex. There, a number of factors hindered the scaling-­‐up of the eviction of breastfeeding as a preventive strategy regarding HIV risk. The main ones were the risks related to formula feeding in settings where the sanitation level is low and drinking or potable water is scarce, where access to fuel or electricity for heating and refrigerating formula based milk is not general, where literacy rates amongst women are limited, and where the epidemiological environment makes diarrhea common and malnutrition a leading cause of infant mortality. Also, a number of scientists under-­‐estimated the impact of the AIDS epidemic at a time when it had not reached its peak in all African sub-­‐regions, and doubted about the necessity to set up specific policies (Jelliffe and Jelliffe, 1988 :142).\",\"PeriodicalId\":408766,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethnographies of Breastfeeding\",\"volume\":\"142 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethnographies of Breastfeeding\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003085294-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnographies of Breastfeeding","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003085294-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

流行病学证据表明,在非洲,艾滋病毒阳性母亲所生的婴儿中,有三分之一以上通过母乳喂养传播艾滋病毒,世卫组织建议妇女在预防方案之间做出选择,即纯母乳喂养后早期断奶,或像发达国家那样进行配方喂养。根据在布基纳法索和塞内加尔收集的实地数据,本文将审查妇女如何解释选择/无能力的概念。将介绍有关妇女经验和她们采用的喂养方式的个案研究,这些研究表明社会和医疗环境如何影响决定和做法。这些结果揭示了一些妇女如何制定预防策略,这是卫生专业人员意想不到的,使她们在既不可能母乳喂养也不可能“安全”配方喂养的情况下面临困境。1985年发表了关于通过母乳喂养传播艾滋病毒病例的第一批数据(Ziegler, 1985;OMS /世卫组织,1987;Dunn, 1992年),在发达国家,禁止母乳喂养被迅速采纳为对感染艾滋病毒的妇女的医疗建议。他们被要求用配方奶粉喂养婴儿,配方奶粉将通过社会保险制度或社会项目提供给他们。艾滋病毒阳性妇女所生婴儿的数量被认为是有限的,配方喂养似乎是一种简单的策略,已经存在,已知是可接受的,而且非常有效,因为它将完全消除艾滋病毒传播的风险。在发展中国家,通过母乳喂养预防艾滋病毒传播的历史更为复杂。在那里,许多因素阻碍了将母乳喂养作为艾滋病毒风险预防策略的推广。主要的风险是在以下环境中与配方奶喂养有关的风险:卫生水平低,饮用水或饮用水稀缺,通常无法获得用于加热和冷藏配方奶的燃料或电力,妇女识字率有限,流行病学环境使腹泻很常见,营养不良是婴儿死亡的主要原因。此外,一些科学家在艾滋病尚未在所有非洲分区域达到顶峰的时候,低估了艾滋病的影响,并对制定具体政策的必要性表示怀疑(Jelliffe和Jelliffe, 1988:142)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Between Proscription and Control of Breastfeeding in West Africa: Women’s Strategies Regarding Prevention of HIV Transmission
With epidemiological evidence indicating that breastfeeding transmits HIV to more than one-­‐third of infants of HIV-­‐positive mothers in Africa, WHO recommendations have advised that women make a choice between preventive options, i.e. early weaning after exclusive breastfeeding, or formula feeding as in developed countries. Based on field data collected in Burkina Faso and Senegal, this paper will examine how the notions of choice/incapacity have been interpretated by women. Case studies will be presented about women's experiences and the feeding patterns they applied that show how the social and medical context shape decisions and practices. These results reveal how some women build lay preventive strategies, unexpected by health professionals that permit them to face dilemma when neither breastfeeding nor " safe " formula feeding is possible. Introduction When the first data about cases of HIV transmission through breastfeeding were published in 1985 (Ziegler, 1985 ; OMS/WHO, 1987; Dunn, 1992), the eviction of breastfeeding was rapidly adopted as a medical recommendation for women living with HIV in developed countries. They were summoned to formula feed their infants, and formula would be provided to them through social insurance systems or social programs. The number of infants born from HIV-­‐positive women was known as limited and formula feeding appeared as an easy strategy, already available, known to be acceptable, quite efficient since it would fully eliminate the risk of HIV transmission. In developing countries, the history of prevention of HIV transmission through breastfeeding was more complex. There, a number of factors hindered the scaling-­‐up of the eviction of breastfeeding as a preventive strategy regarding HIV risk. The main ones were the risks related to formula feeding in settings where the sanitation level is low and drinking or potable water is scarce, where access to fuel or electricity for heating and refrigerating formula based milk is not general, where literacy rates amongst women are limited, and where the epidemiological environment makes diarrhea common and malnutrition a leading cause of infant mortality. Also, a number of scientists under-­‐estimated the impact of the AIDS epidemic at a time when it had not reached its peak in all African sub-­‐regions, and doubted about the necessity to set up specific policies (Jelliffe and Jelliffe, 1988 :142).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信