从飞行时间激光雷达测绘中快速自动处理结构方向

James Smith, S. Yee
{"title":"从飞行时间激光雷达测绘中快速自动处理结构方向","authors":"James Smith, S. Yee","doi":"10.36487/acg_repo/2035_10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The three-dimensional axis mapping (3DAM) method allows rapid capture and orientation of point cloud data to magnetic north in GPS and survey denied environments. From the collected point cloud data, the 3DAM algorithm automates the identification of rock structures and the processing of their orientation into a stereonet format, at the point of data collection, on a timescale measured in seconds. A tool, the Axis Mapper, was created based upon this method and is intended to streamline geological and geotechnical underground mapping of structural orientation data. \nThe objective of this paper is to compare the precision and speed of capture for the Axis Mapper’s orientation measurement to the most prevalent method of orientation capture in underground mines, the structural compass. \nStructural orientation data captured from two case studies—one, at a base metals mine in South America; the second, two mines in Ontario, Canada—were compiled and compared for precision and speed between the Axis Mapper’s 3DAM method and a compass. Additional locations of data captured were planned but could not be collected for this paper. Sources of measurement interference, which could not be mitigated, were present at both case study locations. \nThe data collected from the case studies suggest that structural orientation captured by the Axis Mapper and compass are within 11° dip direction and 5° dip of each other; except in one discreet example which identified a dip difference of 23°. The Canadian case study suggests the Axis Mapper is up to three times faster at collecting structural orientation data when compared with the compass. The authors consider the conclusions preliminary and non-definitive due to the limited number of collection sites, limited available data, and uncontrolled sources of measurement interference. Additional data collected in controlled settings are necessary to better define the comparative precision and collection speed of the Axis Mapper data.","PeriodicalId":241197,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Underground Mining Technology","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rapid automated processing of structural orientation from time-of-flight LiDAR mapping\",\"authors\":\"James Smith, S. Yee\",\"doi\":\"10.36487/acg_repo/2035_10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The three-dimensional axis mapping (3DAM) method allows rapid capture and orientation of point cloud data to magnetic north in GPS and survey denied environments. From the collected point cloud data, the 3DAM algorithm automates the identification of rock structures and the processing of their orientation into a stereonet format, at the point of data collection, on a timescale measured in seconds. A tool, the Axis Mapper, was created based upon this method and is intended to streamline geological and geotechnical underground mapping of structural orientation data. \\nThe objective of this paper is to compare the precision and speed of capture for the Axis Mapper’s orientation measurement to the most prevalent method of orientation capture in underground mines, the structural compass. \\nStructural orientation data captured from two case studies—one, at a base metals mine in South America; the second, two mines in Ontario, Canada—were compiled and compared for precision and speed between the Axis Mapper’s 3DAM method and a compass. Additional locations of data captured were planned but could not be collected for this paper. Sources of measurement interference, which could not be mitigated, were present at both case study locations. \\nThe data collected from the case studies suggest that structural orientation captured by the Axis Mapper and compass are within 11° dip direction and 5° dip of each other; except in one discreet example which identified a dip difference of 23°. The Canadian case study suggests the Axis Mapper is up to three times faster at collecting structural orientation data when compared with the compass. The authors consider the conclusions preliminary and non-definitive due to the limited number of collection sites, limited available data, and uncontrolled sources of measurement interference. Additional data collected in controlled settings are necessary to better define the comparative precision and collection speed of the Axis Mapper data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":241197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Underground Mining Technology\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Underground Mining Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36487/acg_repo/2035_10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Underground Mining Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36487/acg_repo/2035_10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

三维轴映射(3DAM)方法允许在GPS和测量拒绝环境中快速捕获和定位点云数据到磁北。根据收集到的点云数据,3DAM算法可以自动识别岩石结构,并在数据收集点以秒为单位的时间尺度上将其方向处理为立体格式。Axis Mapper是基于这种方法创建的工具,旨在简化构造方向数据的地质和岩土地下测绘。本文的目的是比较Axis Mapper的方位测量的精度和捕获速度与地下矿山中最常用的方位捕获方法——结构罗经。从两个案例研究中获得的结构定向数据——一个是在南美洲的一个贱金属矿;第二个是加拿大安大略省的两个矿山,他们将Axis Mapper的3DAM方法与指南针的精度和速度进行了比较。已计划捕获数据的其他位置,但无法为本文收集。在两个案例研究地点都存在无法减轻的测量干扰源。从案例研究中收集的数据表明,轴向成像仪和罗经捕获的构造方向在11°倾角和5°倾角范围内;除了在一个谨慎的例子中发现了23°的倾角差。加拿大的案例研究表明,与指南针相比,Axis Mapper收集结构方向数据的速度要快三倍。作者认为这些结论是初步的,不确定的,因为收集地点的数量有限,可用数据有限,测量干扰源不受控制。为了更好地定义Axis Mapper数据的相对精度和收集速度,需要在受控设置中收集额外的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rapid automated processing of structural orientation from time-of-flight LiDAR mapping
The three-dimensional axis mapping (3DAM) method allows rapid capture and orientation of point cloud data to magnetic north in GPS and survey denied environments. From the collected point cloud data, the 3DAM algorithm automates the identification of rock structures and the processing of their orientation into a stereonet format, at the point of data collection, on a timescale measured in seconds. A tool, the Axis Mapper, was created based upon this method and is intended to streamline geological and geotechnical underground mapping of structural orientation data. The objective of this paper is to compare the precision and speed of capture for the Axis Mapper’s orientation measurement to the most prevalent method of orientation capture in underground mines, the structural compass. Structural orientation data captured from two case studies—one, at a base metals mine in South America; the second, two mines in Ontario, Canada—were compiled and compared for precision and speed between the Axis Mapper’s 3DAM method and a compass. Additional locations of data captured were planned but could not be collected for this paper. Sources of measurement interference, which could not be mitigated, were present at both case study locations. The data collected from the case studies suggest that structural orientation captured by the Axis Mapper and compass are within 11° dip direction and 5° dip of each other; except in one discreet example which identified a dip difference of 23°. The Canadian case study suggests the Axis Mapper is up to three times faster at collecting structural orientation data when compared with the compass. The authors consider the conclusions preliminary and non-definitive due to the limited number of collection sites, limited available data, and uncontrolled sources of measurement interference. Additional data collected in controlled settings are necessary to better define the comparative precision and collection speed of the Axis Mapper data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信