马可福音中作为哲学家的耶稣

Runar M. Thorsteinsson
{"title":"马可福音中作为哲学家的耶稣","authors":"Runar M. Thorsteinsson","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198815228.003.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The chapter discusses the following aspects of the question of Jesus as philosopher in the Gospel of Mark: ascetic appearance, abandoning one’s family, attitude towards material possessions and outward appearance, Jesus and the philosophers as messengers of God, the wisdom of Jesus, the philosopher’s emotions, and the philosopher’s suffering and death. It is concluded that, in many respects, the figure of Jesus is consistent with contemporary philosophical figures, especially the Stoics, as regards his reported words and deeds. To be sure, there are some minor differences, particularly as regards the feelings of Jesus and the philosopher. In this case, Jesus showed and expressed feelings, like grief and anger, that were not considered characteristic of philosophical figures in general. However, most other features dealt with suggest that Mark may have benefited from contemporary discussions of the philosophical sage.","PeriodicalId":153017,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Interpretations of the New Testament","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Jesus as Philosopher in the Gospel of Mark\",\"authors\":\"Runar M. Thorsteinsson\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780198815228.003.0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The chapter discusses the following aspects of the question of Jesus as philosopher in the Gospel of Mark: ascetic appearance, abandoning one’s family, attitude towards material possessions and outward appearance, Jesus and the philosophers as messengers of God, the wisdom of Jesus, the philosopher’s emotions, and the philosopher’s suffering and death. It is concluded that, in many respects, the figure of Jesus is consistent with contemporary philosophical figures, especially the Stoics, as regards his reported words and deeds. To be sure, there are some minor differences, particularly as regards the feelings of Jesus and the philosopher. In this case, Jesus showed and expressed feelings, like grief and anger, that were not considered characteristic of philosophical figures in general. However, most other features dealt with suggest that Mark may have benefited from contemporary discussions of the philosophical sage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":153017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nordic Interpretations of the New Testament\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nordic Interpretations of the New Testament\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198815228.003.0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Interpretations of the New Testament","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198815228.003.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章讨论了马可福音中耶稣作为哲学家的问题的以下几个方面:苦行僧的外表,抛弃家庭,对物质财富和外表的态度,耶稣和哲学家作为上帝的使者,耶稣的智慧,哲学家的情感,哲学家的痛苦和死亡。结论是,在许多方面,耶稣的形象是一致的当代哲学人物,特别是斯多葛学派,关于他的言行报道。当然,有一些小的不同,特别是关于耶稣和哲学家的感受。在这种情况下,耶稣表现并表达了情感,比如悲伤和愤怒,这些情感通常不被认为是哲学人物的特征。然而,大多数其他特征表明,马克可能受益于当代哲学圣人的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Jesus as Philosopher in the Gospel of Mark
The chapter discusses the following aspects of the question of Jesus as philosopher in the Gospel of Mark: ascetic appearance, abandoning one’s family, attitude towards material possessions and outward appearance, Jesus and the philosophers as messengers of God, the wisdom of Jesus, the philosopher’s emotions, and the philosopher’s suffering and death. It is concluded that, in many respects, the figure of Jesus is consistent with contemporary philosophical figures, especially the Stoics, as regards his reported words and deeds. To be sure, there are some minor differences, particularly as regards the feelings of Jesus and the philosopher. In this case, Jesus showed and expressed feelings, like grief and anger, that were not considered characteristic of philosophical figures in general. However, most other features dealt with suggest that Mark may have benefited from contemporary discussions of the philosophical sage.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信