基于GARCH模型的融资融券对我国股市的影响研究 A Research about Effects Margin Transaction Has on the Stock Market in China Based on GARCH Model

张涛, 邓晓卫, 李凡一, 张苏靖
{"title":"基于GARCH模型的融资融券对我国股市的影响研究 A Research about Effects Margin Transaction Has on the Stock Market in China Based on GARCH Model","authors":"张涛, 邓晓卫, 李凡一, 张苏靖","doi":"10.12677/FIN.2018.81005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"选取2014年3月12日至2016年9月14日之间的619个上证综指的对数收益率以及上交所的融资、融券余额作为样本数据。首先,利用AIC和SC准则确定了GARCH模型的滞后项数;然后,引入虚拟变量作为牛、熊市的划分,建立含虚拟变量的GARCH(1,1)模型,分析融资融券制度对股市波动性的影响。结果显示:1) 融资交易在熊市和牛市均增加了股市的波动性,并且融资交易在熊市时对股市波动性的放大作用比在牛市时更大;2) 融券交易在牛市时,增加了股市的波动性,而在熊市时,对股市的波动性有抑制作用。最后,结合当时的制度、政策及投资者心理,从统计上分析得到:在我国融资融券业务发展不均衡,融资业务规模远远大于融券业务的规模,因此,我国两融业务对股市波动性最重要的影响是融资业务。 Select 619 logarithmic ratio of Shanghai Composite Index and balances of financing and securities loan during the period between 12th March, 2014 and 14th September, 2016 as sample data. Firstly, AIC and SC criteria are used to confirm the lag item numbers of GARCH model. Then, we introduce dummy variables as the partition of bull market and bear market, establish GARCH (1,1) model including dummy variables and analyze the effects that the system of margin transaction has on stock market volatility. The results indicate that: 1) Financing transaction in both bull market and bear market increases stock market volatility and the amplified influence that financing transaction has on the volatility in the bear market is more significant than that in the bull market. 2) Securities trading increases the volatility in the bull market while restrains that in the bear market. Finally, we combine the temporal systems, policies and investors’ mentality and from statistical analysis, we draw a conclusion: In China, financing business and securities business develop unevenly and the scale of financing business is far larger than that of securities business. Thus, in China, financing business exerts more important effects on the fluctuation of the stock market than securities business.","PeriodicalId":251115,"journal":{"name":"The Finance","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"基于GARCH模型的融资融券对我国股市的影响研究 A Research about Effects Margin Transaction Has on the Stock Market in China Based on GARCH Model\",\"authors\":\"张涛, 邓晓卫, 李凡一, 张苏靖\",\"doi\":\"10.12677/FIN.2018.81005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"选取2014年3月12日至2016年9月14日之间的619个上证综指的对数收益率以及上交所的融资、融券余额作为样本数据。首先,利用AIC和SC准则确定了GARCH模型的滞后项数;然后,引入虚拟变量作为牛、熊市的划分,建立含虚拟变量的GARCH(1,1)模型,分析融资融券制度对股市波动性的影响。结果显示:1) 融资交易在熊市和牛市均增加了股市的波动性,并且融资交易在熊市时对股市波动性的放大作用比在牛市时更大;2) 融券交易在牛市时,增加了股市的波动性,而在熊市时,对股市的波动性有抑制作用。最后,结合当时的制度、政策及投资者心理,从统计上分析得到:在我国融资融券业务发展不均衡,融资业务规模远远大于融券业务的规模,因此,我国两融业务对股市波动性最重要的影响是融资业务。 Select 619 logarithmic ratio of Shanghai Composite Index and balances of financing and securities loan during the period between 12th March, 2014 and 14th September, 2016 as sample data. Firstly, AIC and SC criteria are used to confirm the lag item numbers of GARCH model. Then, we introduce dummy variables as the partition of bull market and bear market, establish GARCH (1,1) model including dummy variables and analyze the effects that the system of margin transaction has on stock market volatility. The results indicate that: 1) Financing transaction in both bull market and bear market increases stock market volatility and the amplified influence that financing transaction has on the volatility in the bear market is more significant than that in the bull market. 2) Securities trading increases the volatility in the bull market while restrains that in the bear market. Finally, we combine the temporal systems, policies and investors’ mentality and from statistical analysis, we draw a conclusion: In China, financing business and securities business develop unevenly and the scale of financing business is far larger than that of securities business. Thus, in China, financing business exerts more important effects on the fluctuation of the stock market than securities business.\",\"PeriodicalId\":251115,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Finance\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12677/FIN.2018.81005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12677/FIN.2018.81005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

选取2014年3月12日至2016年9月14日之间的619个上证综指的对数收益率以及上交所的融资、融券余额作为样本数据。首先,利用AIC和SC准则确定了GARCH模型的滞后项数;然后,引入虚拟变量作为牛、熊市的划分,建立含虚拟变量的GARCH(1,1)模型,分析融资融券制度对股市波动性的影响。结果显示:1) 融资交易在熊市和牛市均增加了股市的波动性,并且融资交易在熊市时对股市波动性的放大作用比在牛市时更大;2) 融券交易在牛市时,增加了股市的波动性,而在熊市时,对股市的波动性有抑制作用。最后,结合当时的制度、政策及投资者心理,从统计上分析得到:在我国融资融券业务发展不均衡,融资业务规模远远大于融券业务的规模,因此,我国两融业务对股市波动性最重要的影响是融资业务。 Select 619 logarithmic ratio of Shanghai Composite Index and balances of financing and securities loan during the period between 12th March, 2014 and 14th September, 2016 as sample data. Firstly, AIC and SC criteria are used to confirm the lag item numbers of GARCH model. Then, we introduce dummy variables as the partition of bull market and bear market, establish GARCH (1,1) model including dummy variables and analyze the effects that the system of margin transaction has on stock market volatility. The results indicate that: 1) Financing transaction in both bull market and bear market increases stock market volatility and the amplified influence that financing transaction has on the volatility in the bear market is more significant than that in the bull market. 2) Securities trading increases the volatility in the bull market while restrains that in the bear market. Finally, we combine the temporal systems, policies and investors’ mentality and from statistical analysis, we draw a conclusion: In China, financing business and securities business develop unevenly and the scale of financing business is far larger than that of securities business. Thus, in China, financing business exerts more important effects on the fluctuation of the stock market than securities business.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
基于GARCH模型的融资融券对我国股市的影响研究 A Research about Effects Margin Transaction Has on the Stock Market in China Based on GARCH Model
选取2014年3月12日至2016年9月14日之间的619个上证综指的对数收益率以及上交所的融资、融券余额作为样本数据。首先,利用AIC和SC准则确定了GARCH模型的滞后项数;然后,引入虚拟变量作为牛、熊市的划分,建立含虚拟变量的GARCH(1,1)模型,分析融资融券制度对股市波动性的影响。结果显示:1) 融资交易在熊市和牛市均增加了股市的波动性,并且融资交易在熊市时对股市波动性的放大作用比在牛市时更大;2) 融券交易在牛市时,增加了股市的波动性,而在熊市时,对股市的波动性有抑制作用。最后,结合当时的制度、政策及投资者心理,从统计上分析得到:在我国融资融券业务发展不均衡,融资业务规模远远大于融券业务的规模,因此,我国两融业务对股市波动性最重要的影响是融资业务。 Select 619 logarithmic ratio of Shanghai Composite Index and balances of financing and securities loan during the period between 12th March, 2014 and 14th September, 2016 as sample data. Firstly, AIC and SC criteria are used to confirm the lag item numbers of GARCH model. Then, we introduce dummy variables as the partition of bull market and bear market, establish GARCH (1,1) model including dummy variables and analyze the effects that the system of margin transaction has on stock market volatility. The results indicate that: 1) Financing transaction in both bull market and bear market increases stock market volatility and the amplified influence that financing transaction has on the volatility in the bear market is more significant than that in the bull market. 2) Securities trading increases the volatility in the bull market while restrains that in the bear market. Finally, we combine the temporal systems, policies and investors’ mentality and from statistical analysis, we draw a conclusion: In China, financing business and securities business develop unevenly and the scale of financing business is far larger than that of securities business. Thus, in China, financing business exerts more important effects on the fluctuation of the stock market than securities business.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信