乌克兰国家标准DSTU 4163: 2020:创新和问题

V. Savytskyi
{"title":"乌克兰国家标准DSTU 4163: 2020:创新和问题","authors":"V. Savytskyi","doi":"10.37491/unz.82.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to public interest, caused by the entry into force on 01.09.2021 of the state standard of Ukraine DSTU 4163:2020 «State unified system of documentation. State unified documentation system. Unified system of organizational and administrative documentation. Requirements for execution of documents» this article is an author’s attempt from a professional point of view based on a systems approach to find out and evaluate the essence and significance of the innovations of this standard in relation to their impact on the preparation and execution of organizational and administrative documentation. Comparative analysis of DSTU 4163:2020 with its predecessor DSTU 4163:2003 in the research process was carried out, also a wide source base was used. The article presents comparative characteristics of the structural and semantic structure of these standards and the composition of the document’s requisite indicating statistical and semantic differences using a tabular form. According to the author, the text shows the most significant innovations that distinguish DSTU 4163:2020 from DSTU 4163:2003. Based on the principle of historicism, the article examines retrospective and modern normative-legal relations DSTU 4163: 2020, on the basis of which the author concludes that this standard is completely independent of the normative rudiments of Soviet office work, the full ability of the standard within its status to fully regulate the issue of execution of organizational and administrative documentation, accumulating the most modern requirements of current national legislation in combination with its own innovations. According to the author, one of the problems identified in the research process is the disregard in the standard of changes in the territorial organization of authority that took place in Ukraine in the process of decentralization of power. As a result, the rules of the standard ignore certain issues execution of documents by local executive state administrations and local self-government bodies, which are confirmed by the examples given by the author. The study revealed within this problem of the requisite composition of the forms of local state administrations and local governments contradictions of certain normative-legal acts, legislative unregulated use of forms with the image of the State Emblem of Ukraine, the name of the state and its names by local state administrations and local self-government bodies, as well as some other problems. According to the author, the solution of the problems revealed in the research process is possible in case introduction of the changes offered by it to specifically defined legislative and by-laws.","PeriodicalId":106913,"journal":{"name":"University Scientific Notes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"State Standard of Ukraine DSTU 4163: 2020: Innovations and Problems\",\"authors\":\"V. Savytskyi\",\"doi\":\"10.37491/unz.82.9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"According to public interest, caused by the entry into force on 01.09.2021 of the state standard of Ukraine DSTU 4163:2020 «State unified system of documentation. State unified documentation system. Unified system of organizational and administrative documentation. Requirements for execution of documents» this article is an author’s attempt from a professional point of view based on a systems approach to find out and evaluate the essence and significance of the innovations of this standard in relation to their impact on the preparation and execution of organizational and administrative documentation. Comparative analysis of DSTU 4163:2020 with its predecessor DSTU 4163:2003 in the research process was carried out, also a wide source base was used. The article presents comparative characteristics of the structural and semantic structure of these standards and the composition of the document’s requisite indicating statistical and semantic differences using a tabular form. According to the author, the text shows the most significant innovations that distinguish DSTU 4163:2020 from DSTU 4163:2003. Based on the principle of historicism, the article examines retrospective and modern normative-legal relations DSTU 4163: 2020, on the basis of which the author concludes that this standard is completely independent of the normative rudiments of Soviet office work, the full ability of the standard within its status to fully regulate the issue of execution of organizational and administrative documentation, accumulating the most modern requirements of current national legislation in combination with its own innovations. According to the author, one of the problems identified in the research process is the disregard in the standard of changes in the territorial organization of authority that took place in Ukraine in the process of decentralization of power. As a result, the rules of the standard ignore certain issues execution of documents by local executive state administrations and local self-government bodies, which are confirmed by the examples given by the author. The study revealed within this problem of the requisite composition of the forms of local state administrations and local governments contradictions of certain normative-legal acts, legislative unregulated use of forms with the image of the State Emblem of Ukraine, the name of the state and its names by local state administrations and local self-government bodies, as well as some other problems. According to the author, the solution of the problems revealed in the research process is possible in case introduction of the changes offered by it to specifically defined legislative and by-laws.\",\"PeriodicalId\":106913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University Scientific Notes\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University Scientific Notes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37491/unz.82.9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University Scientific Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37491/unz.82.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

根据公共利益,由于乌克兰国家标准DSTU 4163:2020“国家统一文件系统”于2021年9月1日生效。国家统一文件制度。统一的组织和行政文件制度。文件执行的要求本文是作者从专业的角度出发,基于系统的方法,找出和评价本标准创新的本质和意义,以及它们对组织和行政文件的准备和执行的影响。在研究过程中对DSTU 4163:2020与其前身DSTU 4163:2003进行了比较分析,也使用了广泛的来源基础。本文介绍了这些标准的结构和语义结构的比较特点,以及文件必要条件的组成,用表格形式表明统计和语义上的差异。根据作者的说法,文本显示了区分DSTU 4163:2020和DSTU 4163:2003的最重要的创新。基于历史主义的原则,本文考察了追溯的和现代的规范性法律关系。在此基础上,笔者得出结论,该标准完全独立于苏联办公室工作的规范萌芽,完全有能力在其地位范围内充分规范组织和行政文件的执行问题,积累了当前国家立法的最现代要求,并结合自身的创新。根据作者的说法,在研究过程中发现的问题之一是在权力下放过程中乌克兰发生的领土权力组织变化的标准被忽视。因此,标准的规则忽略了地方国家行政机关和地方自治机构执行文件的某些问题,作者所举的例子证实了这一点。研究表明,在这个问题中,地方国家行政机构和地方政府形式的必要组成与某些规范性法律行为相矛盾,立法上不受管制地使用带有乌克兰国徽图像的形式,地方国家行政机构和地方自治机构使用国家名称和国家名称,以及其他一些问题。根据作者的说法,在研究过程中揭示的问题的解决是可能的,如果引入它提供的具体定义的立法和章程的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
State Standard of Ukraine DSTU 4163: 2020: Innovations and Problems
According to public interest, caused by the entry into force on 01.09.2021 of the state standard of Ukraine DSTU 4163:2020 «State unified system of documentation. State unified documentation system. Unified system of organizational and administrative documentation. Requirements for execution of documents» this article is an author’s attempt from a professional point of view based on a systems approach to find out and evaluate the essence and significance of the innovations of this standard in relation to their impact on the preparation and execution of organizational and administrative documentation. Comparative analysis of DSTU 4163:2020 with its predecessor DSTU 4163:2003 in the research process was carried out, also a wide source base was used. The article presents comparative characteristics of the structural and semantic structure of these standards and the composition of the document’s requisite indicating statistical and semantic differences using a tabular form. According to the author, the text shows the most significant innovations that distinguish DSTU 4163:2020 from DSTU 4163:2003. Based on the principle of historicism, the article examines retrospective and modern normative-legal relations DSTU 4163: 2020, on the basis of which the author concludes that this standard is completely independent of the normative rudiments of Soviet office work, the full ability of the standard within its status to fully regulate the issue of execution of organizational and administrative documentation, accumulating the most modern requirements of current national legislation in combination with its own innovations. According to the author, one of the problems identified in the research process is the disregard in the standard of changes in the territorial organization of authority that took place in Ukraine in the process of decentralization of power. As a result, the rules of the standard ignore certain issues execution of documents by local executive state administrations and local self-government bodies, which are confirmed by the examples given by the author. The study revealed within this problem of the requisite composition of the forms of local state administrations and local governments contradictions of certain normative-legal acts, legislative unregulated use of forms with the image of the State Emblem of Ukraine, the name of the state and its names by local state administrations and local self-government bodies, as well as some other problems. According to the author, the solution of the problems revealed in the research process is possible in case introduction of the changes offered by it to specifically defined legislative and by-laws.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信