理解应急管理中的跨界信息共享:来自美国地方政府公共警报和警告信息的见解

Tzu-Lun Chen, José Ramón Gil-García, G. Burke, Alessandria Dey, Derek Werthmuller
{"title":"理解应急管理中的跨界信息共享:来自美国地方政府公共警报和警告信息的见解","authors":"Tzu-Lun Chen, José Ramón Gil-García, G. Burke, Alessandria Dey, Derek Werthmuller","doi":"10.1145/3598469.3598524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cross-boundary information sharing has a decisive influence on managing natural or human-made disasters. Existing literature provides valuable insights into the actors engaged in information sharing, the factors that influence their willingness to share information, the specific content they share, and the main results of information sharing in the context of emergency management. However, despite these contributions, our current knowledge about this topic is still limited in several ways, including overgeneralizing the involved actors, frequently ignoring the interdependence of multiple information-sharing flows, and a lack of empirical research that assesses information-sharing activities from a holistic point of view. Consequently, this study intends to extend the current discussion by empirically exploring the actors in detail and analyzing the multiple-flow information sharing dynamics. A case study of public alerts and warnings in US local governments was conducted to investigate the distinctive actors and features of information sharing and the factors that affect the information-sharing dynamics. Our interviews with eighteen alerting authorities indicate that both government and nongovernment actors can be subdivided into more specific categories with varying information needs, information resources, and levels of authority. We also find that the success of public alerts and warnings depends largely on the activities in two closely connected stages of information sharing: government-to-government and government-to-citizen, each of which faces unique challenges and has specific enablers. These findings reveal that only through a detailed analysis of various actors and information sharing flows can we have a holistic understanding of cross-boundary information sharing for emergency management and, from a practice perspective, provide a more accurate problem diagnosis for future improvement.","PeriodicalId":401026,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding Cross-Boundary Information Sharing in Emergency Management: Insights from Public Alert and Warning Messages in US Local Governments\",\"authors\":\"Tzu-Lun Chen, José Ramón Gil-García, G. Burke, Alessandria Dey, Derek Werthmuller\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3598469.3598524\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cross-boundary information sharing has a decisive influence on managing natural or human-made disasters. Existing literature provides valuable insights into the actors engaged in information sharing, the factors that influence their willingness to share information, the specific content they share, and the main results of information sharing in the context of emergency management. However, despite these contributions, our current knowledge about this topic is still limited in several ways, including overgeneralizing the involved actors, frequently ignoring the interdependence of multiple information-sharing flows, and a lack of empirical research that assesses information-sharing activities from a holistic point of view. Consequently, this study intends to extend the current discussion by empirically exploring the actors in detail and analyzing the multiple-flow information sharing dynamics. A case study of public alerts and warnings in US local governments was conducted to investigate the distinctive actors and features of information sharing and the factors that affect the information-sharing dynamics. Our interviews with eighteen alerting authorities indicate that both government and nongovernment actors can be subdivided into more specific categories with varying information needs, information resources, and levels of authority. We also find that the success of public alerts and warnings depends largely on the activities in two closely connected stages of information sharing: government-to-government and government-to-citizen, each of which faces unique challenges and has specific enablers. These findings reveal that only through a detailed analysis of various actors and information sharing flows can we have a holistic understanding of cross-boundary information sharing for emergency management and, from a practice perspective, provide a more accurate problem diagnosis for future improvement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":401026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3598469.3598524\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3598469.3598524","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

跨界信息共享对管理自然灾害或人为灾害具有决定性影响。现有文献对应急管理背景下信息共享的行为主体、影响信息共享意愿的因素、共享的具体内容以及信息共享的主要结果提供了有价值的见解。然而,尽管有这些贡献,我们目前关于这一主题的知识仍然在几个方面受到限制,包括过度概括所涉及的参与者,经常忽略多个信息共享流的相互依赖性,以及缺乏从整体角度评估信息共享活动的实证研究。因此,本研究拟通过实证详细探讨行为者和分析多流信息共享动态来扩展目前的讨论。以美国地方政府的公共警报和预警为例,探讨了信息共享的不同行为主体和特征,以及影响信息共享动态的因素。我们对18个警报机构的采访表明,政府和非政府行为者都可以细分为更具体的类别,具有不同的信息需求、信息资源和权限级别。我们还发现,公共警报和预警的成功在很大程度上取决于两个密切相关的信息共享阶段的活动:政府对政府和政府对公民,每个阶段都面临着独特的挑战,并有具体的推动因素。这些发现表明,只有通过对各类行为主体和信息共享流程的详细分析,才能对应急管理跨界信息共享有一个整体的认识,并从实践的角度提供更准确的问题诊断,为未来的改进提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding Cross-Boundary Information Sharing in Emergency Management: Insights from Public Alert and Warning Messages in US Local Governments
Cross-boundary information sharing has a decisive influence on managing natural or human-made disasters. Existing literature provides valuable insights into the actors engaged in information sharing, the factors that influence their willingness to share information, the specific content they share, and the main results of information sharing in the context of emergency management. However, despite these contributions, our current knowledge about this topic is still limited in several ways, including overgeneralizing the involved actors, frequently ignoring the interdependence of multiple information-sharing flows, and a lack of empirical research that assesses information-sharing activities from a holistic point of view. Consequently, this study intends to extend the current discussion by empirically exploring the actors in detail and analyzing the multiple-flow information sharing dynamics. A case study of public alerts and warnings in US local governments was conducted to investigate the distinctive actors and features of information sharing and the factors that affect the information-sharing dynamics. Our interviews with eighteen alerting authorities indicate that both government and nongovernment actors can be subdivided into more specific categories with varying information needs, information resources, and levels of authority. We also find that the success of public alerts and warnings depends largely on the activities in two closely connected stages of information sharing: government-to-government and government-to-citizen, each of which faces unique challenges and has specific enablers. These findings reveal that only through a detailed analysis of various actors and information sharing flows can we have a holistic understanding of cross-boundary information sharing for emergency management and, from a practice perspective, provide a more accurate problem diagnosis for future improvement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信