注射成型过程中的型腔压力与零件质量

D. C. Angstadt, J. Coulter
{"title":"注射成型过程中的型腔压力与零件质量","authors":"D. C. Angstadt, J. Coulter","doi":"10.1115/imece1999-1249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Extensive research has been conducted in an attempt to develop reliable models or indicators for determining product quality based on process information. Relationships between part quality and process variables such as nozzle temperature, hydraulic pressure and cavity pressure have been established using methods such as statistical process control, regression analysis and artificial neural networks. Ideally, these models would be used to determine part quality without direct inspection. If a level of confidence equivalent to that obtained by traditional methods (e.g., SQC) could be achieved, “quality by inspection” could be eliminated. Two drawbacks to these models are that they are specific to the machine/mold/polymer (M/M/P) combination being studied and they require a significant amount of “up-front” process data for model formulation. A method for “normalizing” pressure data obtained from a range of machine/mold/polymer configurations to yield essentially one curve or attribute denoting acceptable part quality would greatly enhance the utility of P-t data in a manufacturing setting. The objective of the present research is to examine the effects on the temporal cavity pressure due to changes in the mold geometry and to investigate methods for obtaining generic pressure data for various geometries. Cavity pressure data was collected using geometric inserts fitted into a standard ASTM tensile specimen cavity. The pressure data was analyzed to determine the correlation between cavity pressure and part quality for three part geometries studied. A discussion of the utility of the pressure is presented and an attempt is made to find a geometry independent cavity pressure attribute for use in determining part quality.","PeriodicalId":410594,"journal":{"name":"The Science, Automation, and Control of Material Processes Involving Coupled Transport and Rheology Changes","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cavity Pressure and Part Quality in the Injection Molding Process\",\"authors\":\"D. C. Angstadt, J. Coulter\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/imece1999-1249\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Extensive research has been conducted in an attempt to develop reliable models or indicators for determining product quality based on process information. Relationships between part quality and process variables such as nozzle temperature, hydraulic pressure and cavity pressure have been established using methods such as statistical process control, regression analysis and artificial neural networks. Ideally, these models would be used to determine part quality without direct inspection. If a level of confidence equivalent to that obtained by traditional methods (e.g., SQC) could be achieved, “quality by inspection” could be eliminated. Two drawbacks to these models are that they are specific to the machine/mold/polymer (M/M/P) combination being studied and they require a significant amount of “up-front” process data for model formulation. A method for “normalizing” pressure data obtained from a range of machine/mold/polymer configurations to yield essentially one curve or attribute denoting acceptable part quality would greatly enhance the utility of P-t data in a manufacturing setting. The objective of the present research is to examine the effects on the temporal cavity pressure due to changes in the mold geometry and to investigate methods for obtaining generic pressure data for various geometries. Cavity pressure data was collected using geometric inserts fitted into a standard ASTM tensile specimen cavity. The pressure data was analyzed to determine the correlation between cavity pressure and part quality for three part geometries studied. A discussion of the utility of the pressure is presented and an attempt is made to find a geometry independent cavity pressure attribute for use in determining part quality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":410594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Science, Automation, and Control of Material Processes Involving Coupled Transport and Rheology Changes\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Science, Automation, and Control of Material Processes Involving Coupled Transport and Rheology Changes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece1999-1249\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Science, Automation, and Control of Material Processes Involving Coupled Transport and Rheology Changes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece1999-1249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

已经进行了广泛的研究,试图开发可靠的模型或指标,以确定基于过程信息的产品质量。利用统计过程控制、回归分析和人工神经网络等方法建立了零件质量与喷嘴温度、液压压力和腔压力等工艺变量之间的关系。理想情况下,这些模型将用于确定零件质量,而无需直接检查。如果可以达到与传统方法(如SQC)所获得的置信度相当的水平,则可以消除“检验质量”。这些模型的两个缺点是,它们是特定于正在研究的机器/模具/聚合物(M/M/P)组合的,并且它们需要大量的“预先”过程数据来进行模型制定。一种“规范化”从一系列机器/模具/聚合物配置中获得的压力数据的方法,基本上可以产生一条表示可接受零件质量的曲线或属性,这将大大提高P-t数据在制造环境中的效用。本研究的目的是研究由于模具几何形状的变化对时间腔压力的影响,并研究获得各种几何形状的通用压力数据的方法。型腔压力数据收集使用几何插入安装到标准ASTM拉伸试样腔。对所研究的三种零件几何形状的压力数据进行了分析,确定了型腔压力与零件质量之间的相关性。讨论了压力的效用,并试图找到一个与几何无关的空腔压力属性,用于确定零件质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cavity Pressure and Part Quality in the Injection Molding Process
Extensive research has been conducted in an attempt to develop reliable models or indicators for determining product quality based on process information. Relationships between part quality and process variables such as nozzle temperature, hydraulic pressure and cavity pressure have been established using methods such as statistical process control, regression analysis and artificial neural networks. Ideally, these models would be used to determine part quality without direct inspection. If a level of confidence equivalent to that obtained by traditional methods (e.g., SQC) could be achieved, “quality by inspection” could be eliminated. Two drawbacks to these models are that they are specific to the machine/mold/polymer (M/M/P) combination being studied and they require a significant amount of “up-front” process data for model formulation. A method for “normalizing” pressure data obtained from a range of machine/mold/polymer configurations to yield essentially one curve or attribute denoting acceptable part quality would greatly enhance the utility of P-t data in a manufacturing setting. The objective of the present research is to examine the effects on the temporal cavity pressure due to changes in the mold geometry and to investigate methods for obtaining generic pressure data for various geometries. Cavity pressure data was collected using geometric inserts fitted into a standard ASTM tensile specimen cavity. The pressure data was analyzed to determine the correlation between cavity pressure and part quality for three part geometries studied. A discussion of the utility of the pressure is presented and an attempt is made to find a geometry independent cavity pressure attribute for use in determining part quality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信