组织公民行为与工作中的社会支持:基于系统动力学的情景分析

Gabrielle Loureiro Costa, Tarízi Cioccari Gomes, Bruna Brandt De Oliveira, Glauco Oliveira Rodrigues, Eugênio de Oliveira Simonetto, Vânia de Fátima Barros Estivalete
{"title":"组织公民行为与工作中的社会支持:基于系统动力学的情景分析","authors":"Gabrielle Loureiro Costa, Tarízi Cioccari Gomes, Bruna Brandt De Oliveira, Glauco Oliveira Rodrigues, Eugênio de Oliveira Simonetto, Vânia de Fátima Barros Estivalete","doi":"10.23925/2237-4418.2021v36i2p.01-16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to present the development and validation of a simulation model that allows the People Management area to evaluate and analyze scenarios based on Organizational Citizenship Behaviors and Social Support at Work. For this, we considered the perspective of IT knowledge workers who work in companies from different states of Brazil. To achieve this goal, the simulation model was elaborated and its possible analysis performed with the system dymanics. The 'current scenario' was based on the study by Costa (2019) who used the Dekas et al. (2013), validated by Andrade (2017) for the Brazilian context and the Siqueira and Gomide Jr Social Work Support Scale (2008). As a result it stands out that Aid had a small growth in the optimistic scenario, compared to the other dimensions, Civic Virtue and Voice. On the other hand, the three dimensions showed large decreases in the pessimistic scenario. It is also noted that the median scenario, in the five years of simulation, increased from 4.04 to 4.12, while the optimistic scenario showed a great increase, from 4.04, value of year 0, reaching 4.91 in year 5.","PeriodicalId":341297,"journal":{"name":"Pensamento & Realidade","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIORS AND SOCIAL SUPPORT AT WORK: SCENARIO ANALYSIS THROUGH SYSTEN DYNAMIC\",\"authors\":\"Gabrielle Loureiro Costa, Tarízi Cioccari Gomes, Bruna Brandt De Oliveira, Glauco Oliveira Rodrigues, Eugênio de Oliveira Simonetto, Vânia de Fátima Barros Estivalete\",\"doi\":\"10.23925/2237-4418.2021v36i2p.01-16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed to present the development and validation of a simulation model that allows the People Management area to evaluate and analyze scenarios based on Organizational Citizenship Behaviors and Social Support at Work. For this, we considered the perspective of IT knowledge workers who work in companies from different states of Brazil. To achieve this goal, the simulation model was elaborated and its possible analysis performed with the system dymanics. The 'current scenario' was based on the study by Costa (2019) who used the Dekas et al. (2013), validated by Andrade (2017) for the Brazilian context and the Siqueira and Gomide Jr Social Work Support Scale (2008). As a result it stands out that Aid had a small growth in the optimistic scenario, compared to the other dimensions, Civic Virtue and Voice. On the other hand, the three dimensions showed large decreases in the pessimistic scenario. It is also noted that the median scenario, in the five years of simulation, increased from 4.04 to 4.12, while the optimistic scenario showed a great increase, from 4.04, value of year 0, reaching 4.91 in year 5.\",\"PeriodicalId\":341297,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pensamento & Realidade\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pensamento & Realidade\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23925/2237-4418.2021v36i2p.01-16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pensamento & Realidade","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23925/2237-4418.2021v36i2p.01-16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在展示一个模拟模型的开发和验证,该模型允许人员管理领域评估和分析基于组织公民行为和工作中的社会支持的情景。为此,我们考虑了在巴西不同州的公司工作的IT知识工作者的观点。为实现这一目标,建立了仿真模型,并结合系统动力学对其进行了可行性分析。“当前情景”基于Costa(2019)使用Dekas等人(2013)的研究,Andrade(2017)针对巴西背景和Siqueira and Gomide Jr社会工作支持量表(2008)进行了验证。因此,与公民美德和声音等其他维度相比,援助在乐观情况下有小幅增长。另一方面,在悲观情景中,三个维度都显示出大幅下降。我们还注意到,在5年的模拟中,中位数情景从4.04上升到4.12,而乐观情景则有很大的增长,从第0年的4.04,到第5年达到4.91。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIORS AND SOCIAL SUPPORT AT WORK: SCENARIO ANALYSIS THROUGH SYSTEN DYNAMIC
This study aimed to present the development and validation of a simulation model that allows the People Management area to evaluate and analyze scenarios based on Organizational Citizenship Behaviors and Social Support at Work. For this, we considered the perspective of IT knowledge workers who work in companies from different states of Brazil. To achieve this goal, the simulation model was elaborated and its possible analysis performed with the system dymanics. The 'current scenario' was based on the study by Costa (2019) who used the Dekas et al. (2013), validated by Andrade (2017) for the Brazilian context and the Siqueira and Gomide Jr Social Work Support Scale (2008). As a result it stands out that Aid had a small growth in the optimistic scenario, compared to the other dimensions, Civic Virtue and Voice. On the other hand, the three dimensions showed large decreases in the pessimistic scenario. It is also noted that the median scenario, in the five years of simulation, increased from 4.04 to 4.12, while the optimistic scenario showed a great increase, from 4.04, value of year 0, reaching 4.91 in year 5.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信