{"title":"均匀可擦除的AFL","authors":"S. Ginsburg, Jonathan Goldstine, S. Greibach","doi":"10.1145/800152.804916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to show that a number of well-known families have property (*). In particular, we prove that the family of context-free languages does indeed have this property. In addition, we show that several familiar subfamilies of the context-free languages, such as the one-counter languages, have property (*). Finally, we show that there are families satisfying (*) which are not subfamilies of the context-free languages, for we prove that any family generated from one-letter languages has property (*), thereby extending a result of [17].","PeriodicalId":229726,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the fourth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1972-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uniformly erasable AFL\",\"authors\":\"S. Ginsburg, Jonathan Goldstine, S. Greibach\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/800152.804916\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this paper is to show that a number of well-known families have property (*). In particular, we prove that the family of context-free languages does indeed have this property. In addition, we show that several familiar subfamilies of the context-free languages, such as the one-counter languages, have property (*). Finally, we show that there are families satisfying (*) which are not subfamilies of the context-free languages, for we prove that any family generated from one-letter languages has property (*), thereby extending a result of [17].\",\"PeriodicalId\":229726,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the fourth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1972-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the fourth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/800152.804916\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the fourth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/800152.804916","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The purpose of this paper is to show that a number of well-known families have property (*). In particular, we prove that the family of context-free languages does indeed have this property. In addition, we show that several familiar subfamilies of the context-free languages, such as the one-counter languages, have property (*). Finally, we show that there are families satisfying (*) which are not subfamilies of the context-free languages, for we prove that any family generated from one-letter languages has property (*), thereby extending a result of [17].