“不是弹窗!””

M. Ferreri
{"title":"“不是弹窗!””","authors":"M. Ferreri","doi":"10.5117/9789462984912_CH03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recessional London, the celebration of pop-up art spaces plays an\n important part in the official narrative of temporary use as countercultural,\n secretive, transgressive and slightly illicit. This chapter mobilises\n the standpoint of visual and performative arts practitioners to analyse\n motivations and constraints in lawful and unlawful negotiations to access\n vacant spaces and their position within wider geographies of urban\n change. Through longitudinal case studies, it discusses tensions between\n community-oriented and career-oriented temporary practices and how\n these play out in relation to shifting cultural and urban policy. The selfreflexive\n experiences of practitioners reveal a critique of the ‘pop-up’\n logic and the role of entrepreneurial space activators in the cracks of the\n creative city.","PeriodicalId":371064,"journal":{"name":"The Permanence of Temporary Urbanism","volume":"324 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Not a pop-up!’\",\"authors\":\"M. Ferreri\",\"doi\":\"10.5117/9789462984912_CH03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recessional London, the celebration of pop-up art spaces plays an\\n important part in the official narrative of temporary use as countercultural,\\n secretive, transgressive and slightly illicit. This chapter mobilises\\n the standpoint of visual and performative arts practitioners to analyse\\n motivations and constraints in lawful and unlawful negotiations to access\\n vacant spaces and their position within wider geographies of urban\\n change. Through longitudinal case studies, it discusses tensions between\\n community-oriented and career-oriented temporary practices and how\\n these play out in relation to shifting cultural and urban policy. The selfreflexive\\n experiences of practitioners reveal a critique of the ‘pop-up’\\n logic and the role of entrepreneurial space activators in the cracks of the\\n creative city.\",\"PeriodicalId\":371064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Permanence of Temporary Urbanism\",\"volume\":\"324 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Permanence of Temporary Urbanism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5117/9789462984912_CH03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Permanence of Temporary Urbanism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5117/9789462984912_CH03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在经济衰退的伦敦,对快闪艺术空间的庆祝,在官方对临时使用的描述中扮演着重要角色,因为它是反文化的、秘密的、越界的、有点非法的。本章动员视觉和表演艺术从业者的立场来分析合法和非法谈判的动机和限制,以获得空置空间及其在城市变化的更广泛地理位置中的地位。通过纵向案例研究,它讨论了社区导向和职业导向的临时实践之间的紧张关系,以及它们如何在不断变化的文化和城市政策中发挥作用。实践者的自我反思经验揭示了对“弹出式”逻辑和创业空间激活者在创意城市裂缝中的作用的批判。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘Not a pop-up!’
In recessional London, the celebration of pop-up art spaces plays an important part in the official narrative of temporary use as countercultural, secretive, transgressive and slightly illicit. This chapter mobilises the standpoint of visual and performative arts practitioners to analyse motivations and constraints in lawful and unlawful negotiations to access vacant spaces and their position within wider geographies of urban change. Through longitudinal case studies, it discusses tensions between community-oriented and career-oriented temporary practices and how these play out in relation to shifting cultural and urban policy. The selfreflexive experiences of practitioners reveal a critique of the ‘pop-up’ logic and the role of entrepreneurial space activators in the cracks of the creative city.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信