欧盟的单一解决机制:善意与无意之恶

J. Dermine
{"title":"欧盟的单一解决机制:善意与无意之恶","authors":"J. Dermine","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2838793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following the global financial crisis of 2008, a new architecture for global financial markets has emerged. It aims to sever the link between bank losses, state aid and sovereign risk, and put an end to the doctrine of “too-big-to fail” and moral hazard thanks to the privatization of losses. As of January 2016, the European Union operates the single resolution mechanism (SRM) for banks in the euro-zone countries. In our opinion, in its current form the SRM creates a unintended evil: a significant increase in the likelihood of bank runs. Since this is the prime cause of financial crises around the world, there is an urgent need to address this shortcoming. Five alternative solutions are discussed.","PeriodicalId":382921,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Regulation (European) (Topic)","volume":"105 11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Single Resolution Mechanism in the European Union: Good Intentions and Unintended Evil\",\"authors\":\"J. Dermine\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2838793\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Following the global financial crisis of 2008, a new architecture for global financial markets has emerged. It aims to sever the link between bank losses, state aid and sovereign risk, and put an end to the doctrine of “too-big-to fail” and moral hazard thanks to the privatization of losses. As of January 2016, the European Union operates the single resolution mechanism (SRM) for banks in the euro-zone countries. In our opinion, in its current form the SRM creates a unintended evil: a significant increase in the likelihood of bank runs. Since this is the prime cause of financial crises around the world, there is an urgent need to address this shortcoming. Five alternative solutions are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":382921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Regulation (European) (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"105 11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Regulation (European) (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2838793\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Regulation (European) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2838793","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

2008年全球金融危机之后,全球金融市场出现了一种新的架构。它旨在切断银行亏损、政府援助和主权风险之间的联系,并通过亏损私有化终结“大到不能倒”的信条和道德风险。截至2016年1月,欧盟对欧元区国家的银行实行单一处置机制(SRM)。在我们看来,SRM目前的形式造成了一个意想不到的祸害:银行挤兑的可能性显著增加。由于这是全球金融危机的主要原因,因此迫切需要解决这一缺点。讨论了五种备选解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Single Resolution Mechanism in the European Union: Good Intentions and Unintended Evil
Following the global financial crisis of 2008, a new architecture for global financial markets has emerged. It aims to sever the link between bank losses, state aid and sovereign risk, and put an end to the doctrine of “too-big-to fail” and moral hazard thanks to the privatization of losses. As of January 2016, the European Union operates the single resolution mechanism (SRM) for banks in the euro-zone countries. In our opinion, in its current form the SRM creates a unintended evil: a significant increase in the likelihood of bank runs. Since this is the prime cause of financial crises around the world, there is an urgent need to address this shortcoming. Five alternative solutions are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信