图形数据库的实证比较

Salim Jouili, Valentin Vansteenberghe
{"title":"图形数据库的实证比较","authors":"Salim Jouili, Valentin Vansteenberghe","doi":"10.1109/SocialCom.2013.106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, more and more companies provide services that can not be anymore achieved efficiently using relational databases. As such, these companies are forced to use alternative database models such as XML databases, object-oriented databases, document-oriented databases and, more recently graph databases. Graph databases only exist for a few years. Although there have been some comparison attempts, they are mostly focused on certain aspects only. In this paper, we present a distributed graph database comparison framework and the results we obtained by comparing four important players in the graph databases market: Neo4j, Orient DB, Titan and DEX.","PeriodicalId":129308,"journal":{"name":"2013 International Conference on Social Computing","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"142","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Empirical Comparison of Graph Databases\",\"authors\":\"Salim Jouili, Valentin Vansteenberghe\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SocialCom.2013.106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years, more and more companies provide services that can not be anymore achieved efficiently using relational databases. As such, these companies are forced to use alternative database models such as XML databases, object-oriented databases, document-oriented databases and, more recently graph databases. Graph databases only exist for a few years. Although there have been some comparison attempts, they are mostly focused on certain aspects only. In this paper, we present a distributed graph database comparison framework and the results we obtained by comparing four important players in the graph databases market: Neo4j, Orient DB, Titan and DEX.\",\"PeriodicalId\":129308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 International Conference on Social Computing\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"142\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 International Conference on Social Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SocialCom.2013.106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 International Conference on Social Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SocialCom.2013.106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 142

摘要

近年来,越来越多的企业所提供的服务已经无法通过关系数据库高效地实现。因此,这些公司被迫使用其他数据库模型,如XML数据库、面向对象的数据库、面向文档的数据库以及最近的图形数据库。图形数据库只存在了几年。虽然有一些比较的尝试,但它们大多只集中在某些方面。在本文中,我们提出了一个分布式图数据库比较框架,并通过比较图数据库市场上的四个重要参与者:Neo4j, Orient DB, Titan和DEX得出了我们的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Empirical Comparison of Graph Databases
In recent years, more and more companies provide services that can not be anymore achieved efficiently using relational databases. As such, these companies are forced to use alternative database models such as XML databases, object-oriented databases, document-oriented databases and, more recently graph databases. Graph databases only exist for a few years. Although there have been some comparison attempts, they are mostly focused on certain aspects only. In this paper, we present a distributed graph database comparison framework and the results we obtained by comparing four important players in the graph databases market: Neo4j, Orient DB, Titan and DEX.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信