获取有效信息

A. Silman, G. Macfarlane, T. Macfarlane
{"title":"获取有效信息","authors":"A. Silman, G. Macfarlane, T. Macfarlane","doi":"10.1093/MED/9780198814726.003.0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Validity in respect of information that is collected in an epidemiological study is a measure of how accurate the data collected are, relative to an underlying truth. Classical approaches aim to ensure that the approach is both sensitive (low false negatives) and specific (low false positives) as, for example, in determining the presence or absence of a disease. A modified approach is needed where the value of an attribute is collected. Underpinning both these approaches is the need to consider what is the test of the underlying truth. The reader may already be aware of the application of validity tests in assessing the performance of diagnostic and screening tests. It is conventional to evaluate this performance in terms of the two indicators, sensitivity and specificity.","PeriodicalId":186966,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiological Studies: A Practical Guide","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Obtaining valid information\",\"authors\":\"A. Silman, G. Macfarlane, T. Macfarlane\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/MED/9780198814726.003.0011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Validity in respect of information that is collected in an epidemiological study is a measure of how accurate the data collected are, relative to an underlying truth. Classical approaches aim to ensure that the approach is both sensitive (low false negatives) and specific (low false positives) as, for example, in determining the presence or absence of a disease. A modified approach is needed where the value of an attribute is collected. Underpinning both these approaches is the need to consider what is the test of the underlying truth. The reader may already be aware of the application of validity tests in assessing the performance of diagnostic and screening tests. It is conventional to evaluate this performance in terms of the two indicators, sensitivity and specificity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":186966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epidemiological Studies: A Practical Guide\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epidemiological Studies: A Practical Guide\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/MED/9780198814726.003.0011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiological Studies: A Practical Guide","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/MED/9780198814726.003.0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

流行病学研究中收集的信息的有效性是衡量所收集的数据相对于基本事实的准确性。传统方法旨在确保该方法既敏感(低假阴性)又特异性(低假阳性),例如,在确定是否存在某种疾病时。在收集属性值的地方需要一种修改过的方法。支撑这两种方法的是需要考虑什么是对基本真理的检验。读者可能已经意识到有效性测试在评估诊断和筛选测试的性能的应用。通常从敏感性和特异性两个指标来评价这一性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Obtaining valid information
Validity in respect of information that is collected in an epidemiological study is a measure of how accurate the data collected are, relative to an underlying truth. Classical approaches aim to ensure that the approach is both sensitive (low false negatives) and specific (low false positives) as, for example, in determining the presence or absence of a disease. A modified approach is needed where the value of an attribute is collected. Underpinning both these approaches is the need to consider what is the test of the underlying truth. The reader may already be aware of the application of validity tests in assessing the performance of diagnostic and screening tests. It is conventional to evaluate this performance in terms of the two indicators, sensitivity and specificity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信