白人统治的地方:秘密的强制仲裁制度如何伤害妇女和少数民族

Aaj Research
{"title":"白人统治的地方:秘密的强制仲裁制度如何伤害妇女和少数民族","authors":"Aaj Research","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3878360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Arbitrators are mostly male and overwhelmingly white. Women and minorities are more likely than white men to be forced into arbitration, which prevents them from having judges and juries hear their cases. Corporate defendants disfavor female and minority arbitrators. When they do oversee cases, female arbitrators rule in favor of consumers and employees more often than male arbitrators.","PeriodicalId":108281,"journal":{"name":"Women & Law eJournal","volume":"258 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Where White Men Rule: How the Secretive System of Forced Arbitration Hurts Women and Minorities\",\"authors\":\"Aaj Research\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3878360\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Arbitrators are mostly male and overwhelmingly white. Women and minorities are more likely than white men to be forced into arbitration, which prevents them from having judges and juries hear their cases. Corporate defendants disfavor female and minority arbitrators. When they do oversee cases, female arbitrators rule in favor of consumers and employees more often than male arbitrators.\",\"PeriodicalId\":108281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Women & Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"258 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Women & Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3878360\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women & Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3878360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

仲裁员大多是男性,而且绝大多数是白人。女性和少数族裔比白人男性更有可能被迫接受仲裁,这使得他们无法让法官和陪审团审理他们的案件。公司被告不支持女性和少数族裔仲裁员。当他们监督案件时,女性仲裁员的裁决往往比男性仲裁员更有利于消费者和雇员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Where White Men Rule: How the Secretive System of Forced Arbitration Hurts Women and Minorities
Arbitrators are mostly male and overwhelmingly white. Women and minorities are more likely than white men to be forced into arbitration, which prevents them from having judges and juries hear their cases. Corporate defendants disfavor female and minority arbitrators. When they do oversee cases, female arbitrators rule in favor of consumers and employees more often than male arbitrators.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信