单户建筑结构设计中常规和砌块砌体(EPS)加固使用的比较

Lalesca Boeno Vicensi, P. Zini, R. Mores, Aline Schuck
{"title":"单户建筑结构设计中常规和砌块砌体(EPS)加固使用的比较","authors":"Lalesca Boeno Vicensi, P. Zini, R. Mores, Aline Schuck","doi":"10.29183/2596-237x.ensus2023.v11.n2.p534-548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this work is to compare two methods of application of structural loads for a Single Family Residential Building a) conventional masonry; b) EPS (Expanded Polystyrene) block, where the Eberick V10 software was used to launch the structural projects. According to Krüger and Silva (2019), it was developed for structural design in reinforced concrete, including the launching of the structure, analysis, design and detailing. After dimensioning and analyzing the structural design of conventional masonry with a wall load of 1900 kgf/m³, with the copy, it replaced the wall loads to 400 kgf/m³ corresponding to the specific weight of the EPS block. With the comparative results of the structural design of conventional masonry and the EPS block, it is identified that the vertical load on the foundation reached a good reduction in relation to the whole of the single-family residential building. But the weight of the reinforcements and the moments on the beams showed little difference,even so the structural design of the EPS block stood out in relation to conventional masonry, reducing the amount of load and reinforcement, making a more economical and viable construction.","PeriodicalId":115879,"journal":{"name":"ENSUS2023 - XI Encontro de Sustentabilidade em Projeto","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the use of reinforcement in conventional and block masonry (EPS) in the structural design of a single-family building\",\"authors\":\"Lalesca Boeno Vicensi, P. Zini, R. Mores, Aline Schuck\",\"doi\":\"10.29183/2596-237x.ensus2023.v11.n2.p534-548\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of this work is to compare two methods of application of structural loads for a Single Family Residential Building a) conventional masonry; b) EPS (Expanded Polystyrene) block, where the Eberick V10 software was used to launch the structural projects. According to Krüger and Silva (2019), it was developed for structural design in reinforced concrete, including the launching of the structure, analysis, design and detailing. After dimensioning and analyzing the structural design of conventional masonry with a wall load of 1900 kgf/m³, with the copy, it replaced the wall loads to 400 kgf/m³ corresponding to the specific weight of the EPS block. With the comparative results of the structural design of conventional masonry and the EPS block, it is identified that the vertical load on the foundation reached a good reduction in relation to the whole of the single-family residential building. But the weight of the reinforcements and the moments on the beams showed little difference,even so the structural design of the EPS block stood out in relation to conventional masonry, reducing the amount of load and reinforcement, making a more economical and viable construction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":115879,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ENSUS2023 - XI Encontro de Sustentabilidade em Projeto\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ENSUS2023 - XI Encontro de Sustentabilidade em Projeto\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29183/2596-237x.ensus2023.v11.n2.p534-548\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ENSUS2023 - XI Encontro de Sustentabilidade em Projeto","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29183/2596-237x.ensus2023.v11.n2.p534-548","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项工作的目的是比较单户住宅建筑结构荷载的两种应用方法a)传统砌体;b) EPS (Expanded Polystyrene)块,其中使用Eberick V10软件启动结构项目。根据kr格尔和席尔瓦(2019)的说法,它是为钢筋混凝土的结构设计而开发的,包括结构的启动、分析、设计和细节。在对墙体荷载为1900 kgf/m³的常规砌体结构设计进行尺寸确定和分析后,将墙体荷载替换为与EPS砌块比重相对应的400 kgf/m³。通过常规砌体结构设计与EPS砌块结构设计的对比,发现相对于整栋独栋住宅,基础竖向荷载得到了较好的降低。但是,增强筋的重量和梁上的力矩几乎没有区别,即使如此,EPS砌块的结构设计与传统砌体相比仍然脱颖而出,减少了载荷和增强筋的数量,使其成为一种更经济可行的建筑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the use of reinforcement in conventional and block masonry (EPS) in the structural design of a single-family building
The objective of this work is to compare two methods of application of structural loads for a Single Family Residential Building a) conventional masonry; b) EPS (Expanded Polystyrene) block, where the Eberick V10 software was used to launch the structural projects. According to Krüger and Silva (2019), it was developed for structural design in reinforced concrete, including the launching of the structure, analysis, design and detailing. After dimensioning and analyzing the structural design of conventional masonry with a wall load of 1900 kgf/m³, with the copy, it replaced the wall loads to 400 kgf/m³ corresponding to the specific weight of the EPS block. With the comparative results of the structural design of conventional masonry and the EPS block, it is identified that the vertical load on the foundation reached a good reduction in relation to the whole of the single-family residential building. But the weight of the reinforcements and the moments on the beams showed little difference,even so the structural design of the EPS block stood out in relation to conventional masonry, reducing the amount of load and reinforcement, making a more economical and viable construction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信