CityGML和IndoorGML两种OGC室内空间标准的比较

H. Ryoo, Taehoon Kim, Ki-Joune Li
{"title":"CityGML和IndoorGML两种OGC室内空间标准的比较","authors":"H. Ryoo, Taehoon Kim, Ki-Joune Li","doi":"10.1145/2834812.2834813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently two standards - OGC CityGML [1] and OGC IndoorGML [2] - have been developed by the Open Geospatial Consortium(OGC) [3] for the interoperability between services and reusability of indoor maps. Although CityGML and IndoorGML provide frameworks of standard data models for indoor spaces, the goals and approaches of these standards are different and they can be used in a complementary way. This paper therefore aims to study their strengths and weakness, clarify which standard to be used for different types of applications, and explain how to integrate them to make useful applications. This work is based on the experiments of two real sites in Seoul; a shopping mall at Lotte World Mall and a subway station in Seoul. The comparative study is conducted from the representation and application viewpoints respectively.","PeriodicalId":345028,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Seventh ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Indoor Spatial Awareness","volume":"136 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between two OGC standards for indoor space: CityGML and IndoorGML\",\"authors\":\"H. Ryoo, Taehoon Kim, Ki-Joune Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2834812.2834813\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recently two standards - OGC CityGML [1] and OGC IndoorGML [2] - have been developed by the Open Geospatial Consortium(OGC) [3] for the interoperability between services and reusability of indoor maps. Although CityGML and IndoorGML provide frameworks of standard data models for indoor spaces, the goals and approaches of these standards are different and they can be used in a complementary way. This paper therefore aims to study their strengths and weakness, clarify which standard to be used for different types of applications, and explain how to integrate them to make useful applications. This work is based on the experiments of two real sites in Seoul; a shopping mall at Lotte World Mall and a subway station in Seoul. The comparative study is conducted from the representation and application viewpoints respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":345028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Seventh ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Indoor Spatial Awareness\",\"volume\":\"136 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Seventh ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Indoor Spatial Awareness\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2834812.2834813\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Seventh ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Indoor Spatial Awareness","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2834812.2834813","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

摘要

最近,开放地理空间联盟(OGC)[3]开发了两个标准——OGC CityGML[1]和OGC IndoorGML[2],用于服务之间的互操作性和室内地图的可重用性。尽管CityGML和IndoorGML为室内空间提供了标准数据模型框架,但这些标准的目标和方法是不同的,它们可以以互补的方式使用。因此,本文旨在研究它们的优缺点,明确不同类型的应用程序应使用哪种标准,并解释如何将它们集成以制作有用的应用程序。这项工作是基于首尔两个真实地点的实验;乐天世界购物中心和首尔地铁站。分别从表征和应用的角度进行了比较研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison between two OGC standards for indoor space: CityGML and IndoorGML
Recently two standards - OGC CityGML [1] and OGC IndoorGML [2] - have been developed by the Open Geospatial Consortium(OGC) [3] for the interoperability between services and reusability of indoor maps. Although CityGML and IndoorGML provide frameworks of standard data models for indoor spaces, the goals and approaches of these standards are different and they can be used in a complementary way. This paper therefore aims to study their strengths and weakness, clarify which standard to be used for different types of applications, and explain how to integrate them to make useful applications. This work is based on the experiments of two real sites in Seoul; a shopping mall at Lotte World Mall and a subway station in Seoul. The comparative study is conducted from the representation and application viewpoints respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信