中东欧国家对不公平合同条款的规制

M. Hulmák
{"title":"中东欧国家对不公平合同条款的规制","authors":"M. Hulmák","doi":"10.31262/1339-5467/2023/11/2/21-42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper summarizes results of a comparison of unfair clause legislation in the Central and Eastern European countries. In the introductory part, the development of the regulation of unfair terms, the sources of inspiration as well as the different approaches in traditional civil law countries are described. Subsequently, the regulations in the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Slovenia, Serbia and Croatia are compared. The contemporary regulation is based on the minimum standards of the Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts. Nevertheless, the scope of protection varies in its effects in particular states (e.g. scope of applicability, nature and number of prohibited clauses). The increasing importance of public authority in enforcement is evident. In the countries compared, protection against unfair terms is not limited only to consumer contracts, but it applies in different extent to some others as well.","PeriodicalId":406988,"journal":{"name":"Societas et Iurisprudentia","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regulation of Unfair Contract Terms in Central and Eastern European Countries\",\"authors\":\"M. Hulmák\",\"doi\":\"10.31262/1339-5467/2023/11/2/21-42\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper summarizes results of a comparison of unfair clause legislation in the Central and Eastern European countries. In the introductory part, the development of the regulation of unfair terms, the sources of inspiration as well as the different approaches in traditional civil law countries are described. Subsequently, the regulations in the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Slovenia, Serbia and Croatia are compared. The contemporary regulation is based on the minimum standards of the Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts. Nevertheless, the scope of protection varies in its effects in particular states (e.g. scope of applicability, nature and number of prohibited clauses). The increasing importance of public authority in enforcement is evident. In the countries compared, protection against unfair terms is not limited only to consumer contracts, but it applies in different extent to some others as well.\",\"PeriodicalId\":406988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Societas et Iurisprudentia\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Societas et Iurisprudentia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31262/1339-5467/2023/11/2/21-42\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Societas et Iurisprudentia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31262/1339-5467/2023/11/2/21-42","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文总结了中欧和东欧国家不公平条款立法比较的结果。绪论部分主要介绍了大陆法系传统国家对不公平条款规制的发展、启示的来源以及不同的规制方式。随后,对捷克共和国、斯洛伐克、匈牙利、波兰、罗马尼亚、斯洛文尼亚、塞尔维亚和克罗地亚的法规进行了比较。现行条例是根据理事会1993年4月5日关于消费者合同中的不公平条款的第93/13/EEC号指令的最低标准制定的。然而,保护范围在特定国家的影响各不相同(例如,适用范围、禁止条款的性质和数量)。公共权力在执法方面日益重要,这是显而易见的。在所比较的国家中,对不公平条款的保护不仅限于消费者合同,而且在不同程度上也适用于其他一些国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Regulation of Unfair Contract Terms in Central and Eastern European Countries
The paper summarizes results of a comparison of unfair clause legislation in the Central and Eastern European countries. In the introductory part, the development of the regulation of unfair terms, the sources of inspiration as well as the different approaches in traditional civil law countries are described. Subsequently, the regulations in the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Slovenia, Serbia and Croatia are compared. The contemporary regulation is based on the minimum standards of the Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts. Nevertheless, the scope of protection varies in its effects in particular states (e.g. scope of applicability, nature and number of prohibited clauses). The increasing importance of public authority in enforcement is evident. In the countries compared, protection against unfair terms is not limited only to consumer contracts, but it applies in different extent to some others as well.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信