关于完善俄罗斯联邦房地产市场监管的问题

M. Demchenko
{"title":"关于完善俄罗斯联邦房地产市场监管的问题","authors":"M. Demchenko","doi":"10.18572/1813-1204-2020-8-28-32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of writing a scientific work is to study the regulation of the real estate market, the role of the notary in ensuring the protection of the rights of participants in civil turnover and the formation of proposals to expand the powers of the notary to certify real estate transactions. Examining the dynamics of litigation in relation to real estate objects, it is stated that a significant number of them, undoubtedly, arise due to the functioning of various kinds of fraudulent schemes when making the transactions in question. It is noted that in recent years, fraudulent schemes for the unauthorized use of electronic digital signatures for processing transactions have become widespread in the real estate market. Based on the analysis of judicial practice in cases of challenging registered rights to real estate, on invalidating contracts for the sale of residential premises, it was concluded that state registration cannot fully provide for cases of unfair actions in the field of real estate turnover. The best option to ensure the interests of the owners of rights to real estate when concluding transactions with it is notarization of the transaction. For this reason, the paper concludes that it is advisable to diversify the range of transactions, the notarization of which is most appropriate in modern conditions.","PeriodicalId":214894,"journal":{"name":"Notary","volume":"28 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ON THE ISSUE OF IMPROVING THE REGULATION OF THE REAL ESTATE MARKET IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION\",\"authors\":\"M. Demchenko\",\"doi\":\"10.18572/1813-1204-2020-8-28-32\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of writing a scientific work is to study the regulation of the real estate market, the role of the notary in ensuring the protection of the rights of participants in civil turnover and the formation of proposals to expand the powers of the notary to certify real estate transactions. Examining the dynamics of litigation in relation to real estate objects, it is stated that a significant number of them, undoubtedly, arise due to the functioning of various kinds of fraudulent schemes when making the transactions in question. It is noted that in recent years, fraudulent schemes for the unauthorized use of electronic digital signatures for processing transactions have become widespread in the real estate market. Based on the analysis of judicial practice in cases of challenging registered rights to real estate, on invalidating contracts for the sale of residential premises, it was concluded that state registration cannot fully provide for cases of unfair actions in the field of real estate turnover. The best option to ensure the interests of the owners of rights to real estate when concluding transactions with it is notarization of the transaction. For this reason, the paper concludes that it is advisable to diversify the range of transactions, the notarization of which is most appropriate in modern conditions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":214894,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Notary\",\"volume\":\"28 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Notary\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18572/1813-1204-2020-8-28-32\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Notary","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1813-1204-2020-8-28-32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

撰写科学著作的目的是研究房地产市场的调控,公证在保障民事交易参与人权利保护中的作用,并形成扩大公证对房地产交易进行认证的权力的建议。审查与房地产对象有关的诉讼动态,有人指出,其中相当多的诉讼无疑是由于在进行有关交易时各种欺诈计划的运作而产生的。我们注意到,近年来,在房地产市场上,未经授权使用电子数码签署处理交易的欺诈计划十分普遍。通过对不动产登记权挑战案件、住宅房屋买卖合同无效案件的司法实践分析,得出结论认为,国家登记不能完全适用于不动产买卖领域的不公平行为案件。在与房地产进行交易时,确保房地产权利人利益的最佳选择是对交易进行公证。因此,本文认为交易范围的多元化是可取的,其公证在现代条件下是最合适的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ON THE ISSUE OF IMPROVING THE REGULATION OF THE REAL ESTATE MARKET IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
The purpose of writing a scientific work is to study the regulation of the real estate market, the role of the notary in ensuring the protection of the rights of participants in civil turnover and the formation of proposals to expand the powers of the notary to certify real estate transactions. Examining the dynamics of litigation in relation to real estate objects, it is stated that a significant number of them, undoubtedly, arise due to the functioning of various kinds of fraudulent schemes when making the transactions in question. It is noted that in recent years, fraudulent schemes for the unauthorized use of electronic digital signatures for processing transactions have become widespread in the real estate market. Based on the analysis of judicial practice in cases of challenging registered rights to real estate, on invalidating contracts for the sale of residential premises, it was concluded that state registration cannot fully provide for cases of unfair actions in the field of real estate turnover. The best option to ensure the interests of the owners of rights to real estate when concluding transactions with it is notarization of the transaction. For this reason, the paper concludes that it is advisable to diversify the range of transactions, the notarization of which is most appropriate in modern conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信