模拟脾气暴躁

B. Nelson, W. P. Murphy
{"title":"模拟脾气暴躁","authors":"B. Nelson, W. P. Murphy","doi":"10.1109/WSC.2013.6721402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Computer simulation is a true success story of modern analysis, so it is hard to be anything but positive about it. But the Simulation Curmudgeon∗ thinks maybe we should question some of the standard practices of simulation. In particular, he complains “Why do we teach people to build simulation models as if they will never change? Why do we treat simulation like poor man's queueing theory? Why do we fit input distributions like it's 1922? And why, in 2013, can't we talk to our simulations?” In this presentation the Simulation Curmudgeon will expound (in a lighthearted way) on these complaints, plead guilty to most of them, and offer some thoughts about what we might be doing instead.","PeriodicalId":287132,"journal":{"name":"Online World Conference on Soft Computing in Industrial Applications","volume":"8 11","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The simulation Curmudgeon\",\"authors\":\"B. Nelson, W. P. Murphy\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/WSC.2013.6721402\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Computer simulation is a true success story of modern analysis, so it is hard to be anything but positive about it. But the Simulation Curmudgeon∗ thinks maybe we should question some of the standard practices of simulation. In particular, he complains “Why do we teach people to build simulation models as if they will never change? Why do we treat simulation like poor man's queueing theory? Why do we fit input distributions like it's 1922? And why, in 2013, can't we talk to our simulations?” In this presentation the Simulation Curmudgeon will expound (in a lighthearted way) on these complaints, plead guilty to most of them, and offer some thoughts about what we might be doing instead.\",\"PeriodicalId\":287132,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Online World Conference on Soft Computing in Industrial Applications\",\"volume\":\"8 11\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Online World Conference on Soft Computing in Industrial Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2013.6721402\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online World Conference on Soft Computing in Industrial Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2013.6721402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

计算机模拟是现代分析的一个真正成功的故事,所以很难不对此持肯定态度。但是“模拟脾气暴躁者”(Simulation Curmudgeon)认为,也许我们应该质疑一些模拟的标准做法。他特别抱怨道:“为什么我们教人们建立模拟模型,就好像它们永远不会改变一样?为什么我们把模拟当作穷人排队论?为什么我们要像1922年那样拟合输入分布?为什么在2013年,我们不能和我们的模拟对话?”在这次演讲中,模拟怪脾气将以一种轻松的方式阐述这些抱怨,承认其中的大多数,并提供一些关于我们可以做什么的想法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The simulation Curmudgeon
Computer simulation is a true success story of modern analysis, so it is hard to be anything but positive about it. But the Simulation Curmudgeon∗ thinks maybe we should question some of the standard practices of simulation. In particular, he complains “Why do we teach people to build simulation models as if they will never change? Why do we treat simulation like poor man's queueing theory? Why do we fit input distributions like it's 1922? And why, in 2013, can't we talk to our simulations?” In this presentation the Simulation Curmudgeon will expound (in a lighthearted way) on these complaints, plead guilty to most of them, and offer some thoughts about what we might be doing instead.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信